首页> 外文期刊>Minimally invasive neurosurgery: MIN >Comparison between transuncal approach and upper vertebral transcorporeal approach for unilateral cervical radiculopathy - a preliminary report.
【24h】

Comparison between transuncal approach and upper vertebral transcorporeal approach for unilateral cervical radiculopathy - a preliminary report.

机译:单侧颈椎神经根疾病的经椎入路入路与上椎椎入路入路的比较-初步报告。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The surgical treatments for unilateral cervical radiculopathy have been performed by either the anterior or posterior approach. The anterior approach has usually been used more than the posterior approach. The authors compared the results of newly advanced upper vertebral transcorporeal (UVTC) approach with those of the original transuncal (TU) approach in the anterior approach. METHODS: The anterior cervical microforaminotomy was performed for 60 patients (male:female=40:20) from June, 2000 to October, 2003. 40 patients were treated by the TU approach while 20 patients were operated on by the new UVTC approach. The authors analyzed postoperative changes of disc height, the spinal instability, the average length of hospital stay, the degree of patients' satisfaction and complications from each approach. The mean follow-up period was 9.5 months. RESULTS: In the TU approach, postoperative intervertebral disc height was decreased from 7.1+/-0.65 mm to 6.2+/-0.61 mm. In the UVTC approach, postoperative intervertebral disc height was decreased from 6.6+/-0.43 mm to 6.3+/-0.41 mm. The average length of hospital stay was 5.2 days for the TU approach and 3.4 days for the UVTC approach. In the TU approach, 28 patients experienced excellent results, 11 patients experienced good results, one patient who experienced a fair result was operated by anterior cervical fusion because of a recurrent herniated disc. In the UVTC approach, 16 patients had excellent results and four patients experienced good results. CONCLUSIONS: This comparative study demonstrates that the UVTC approach is a better surgical technique than the TU approach considering the preservation of disc height, spinal stability, length of hospital stay, degree of satisfaction and complications.
机译:目的:单侧颈神经根病的外科手术治疗采用前入路或后入路。通常,前路手术比后路手术使用更多。作者比较了前路入路新先进的上椎经椎入路(UVTC)入路与原始椎间入路(TU)入路的结果。方法:从2000年6月至2003年10月,对60例患者(男性:女性= 40:20)进行了颈椎前路显微开孔术。40例患者采用TU方式治疗,而20例采用新的UVTC方式进行手术。作者分析了每种方法的椎间盘高度,脊柱不稳,平均住院时间,患者满意度和并发症的术后变化。平均随访时间为9.5个月。结果:在TU方法中,术后椎间盘高度从7.1 +/- 0.65mm降低到6.2 +/- 0.61mm。在UVTC方法中,术后椎间盘高度从6.6 +/- 0.43mm降低到6.3 +/- 0.41mm。 TU方法的平均住院时间为5.2天,UVTC方法的平均住院时间为3.4天。在TU方法中,有28例患者获得了优异的疗效,11例患者获得了良好的效果,其中1例患者获得了良好的结果,因为其椎间盘突出而进行了颈前路融合术。在UVTC方法中,有16例患者取得了优异的结果,而4例患者取得了良好的结果。结论:这项比较研究表明,考虑到椎间盘高度,脊柱稳定性,住院时间,满意度和并发症的发生,UVTC方法比TU方法是一种更好的外科手术技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号