...
首页> 外文期刊>Medecine et maladies infectieuses >Cost-effectiveness of linezolid versus vancomycin for hospitalized patients with complicated skin and soft-tissue infections in France.
【24h】

Cost-effectiveness of linezolid versus vancomycin for hospitalized patients with complicated skin and soft-tissue infections in France.

机译:在法国,利奈唑胺与万古霉素在复杂皮肤和软组织感染住院患者中的成本效益。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Studies have shown similar clinical cure rates and shorter length of hospitalization when using linezolid compared to vancomycin in patients with complicated skin and soft-tissue infections due to suspected or proven methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). OBJECTIVE: This study had for aim to compare the cost-effectiveness of linezolid versus vancomycin in French healthcare settings. METHOD: A decision-analytic model followed an average patient from the initiation of an empiric treatment until cure, death or second-line treatment failure. A clinical data probability was obtained from clinical trials, resource utilization data (including treatment duration and length of hospitalization) and prevalence of MRSA was obtained from a Delphi panel, and costs from published sources. RESULTS: First-line cure rate for linezolid-treated patients was 90.7% versus 85.5% for vancomycin; the total cure rates after two lines of treatment were 98.5% and 98.0%, respectively. The average total cost was 7,778euro for linezolid versus 8,777euro for vancomycin. The mean estimated length of hospitalization after two lines of treatment was 10.7 days for linezolid versus 13.3 days for vancomycin. The increased effectiveness and reduced cost lead to more frequent prescription. This did not change after one-way sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: Linezolid may be considered as a cost-effective treatment for patients with complicated skin and soft-tissue infections suspected to be MRSA related in France.
机译:研究表明,由于怀疑或证明耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)而导致复杂的皮肤和软组织感染患者,使用利奈唑胺与万古霉素相比,使用利奈唑胺的临床治愈率相似,住院时间更短。目的:本研究旨在比较利奈唑胺与万古霉素在法国医疗机构中的成本-效果。方法:决策分析模型遵循从经验治疗开始到治愈,死亡或二线治疗失败的一般患者。从临床试验获得临床数据概率,从Delphi小组获得资源利用数据(包括治疗时间和住院时间)和MRSA患病率,并从已公开来源获得成本。结果:利奈唑胺治疗的患者一线治愈率为90.7%,而万古霉素为85.5%;两线治疗后的总治愈率分别为98.5%和98.0%。利奈唑胺的平均总成本为7,778欧元,而万古霉素则为8,777欧元。利奈唑胺在两线治疗后的平均估计住院时间为10.7天,而万古霉素为13.3天。效力的提高和成本的降低导致更频繁的处方。经过单向敏感性分析后,情况没有改变。结论:利奈唑胺可能被认为是法国疑似与MRSA相关的复杂皮肤和软组织感染患者的一种经济有效的治疗方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号