...
首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Surgical Oncology: The Journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology >Focusing on desired outcomes of care after colon cancer resections; Hospital variations in 'textbook outcome'
【24h】

Focusing on desired outcomes of care after colon cancer resections; Hospital variations in 'textbook outcome'

机译:专注于结肠癌切除术后的预期护理结果;医院在“教科书结果”中的差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Aims: We propose a summarizing measure for outcome indicators, representing the proportion of patients for whom all desired short-term outcomes of care (a 'textbook outcome') is realized. The aim of this study was to investigate hospital variation in the proportion of patients with a 'textbook outcome' after colon cancer resections in the Netherlands. Methods: Patients who underwent a colon cancer resection in 2010 in the Netherlands were included in the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit. A textbook outcome was defined as hospital survival, radical resection, no reintervention, no ostomy, no adverse outcome and a hospital stay < 14 days. We calculated the number of hospitals with a significantly higher (positive outlier) or lower (negative outlier) Observed/Expected (O/E) textbook outcome than average. As quality measures may be more discriminative in a low-risk population, analyses were repeated for low-risk patients only. Results: A total of 5582 patients, treated in 82 hospitals were included. Average textbook outcome was 49% (range 26-71%). Eight hospitals were identified as negative outliers. In these hospitals a 'textbook outcome' was realized in 35% vs. 52% in average hospitals (p < 0.01). In a sub-Analysis for low-risk patients, only one additional negative outlier was identified. Conclusions: The textbook outcome, representing the proportion of patients with a perfect hospitalization, gives a simple comprehensive summary of hospital performance, while preventing indicator driven practice. Therewith the 'textbook outcome' is meaningful for patients, providers, insurance companies and healthcare inspectorate.
机译:目的:我们对结果指标提出了一种概括性的衡量标准,该指标代表实现了所有期望的短期护理结果(“教科书结果”)的患者比例。这项研究的目的是调查荷兰结肠癌切除术后具有“教科书结果”的患者比例的医院差异。方法:2010年在荷兰接受结肠癌切除术的患者被纳入荷兰外科结直肠癌审核。一本教科书的结果被定义为医院生存,根治性切除,无再次干预,无造口术,无不良结果以及住院时间少于14天。我们计算了观察/预期(O / E)教科书结果比平均水平高(阳性离群值)或较低(负离群值)的医院数量。由于在低危人群中质量指标可能更具区分性,因此仅对低危患者进行重复分析。结果:共纳入5582例患者,在82所医院接受治疗。教科书的平均结果为49%(范围26-71%)。八家医院被确定为负异常值。在这些医院中,“教科书结果”的实现率为35%,而普通医院为52%(p <0.01)。在针对低风险患者的亚分析中,仅发现了一个额外的阴性离群值。结论:教科书的结果代表了完美住院的患者比例,对医院绩效进行了简单,全面的总结,同时防止了指标驱动的实践。因此,“教科书结果”对于患者,医疗服务提供者,保险公司和医疗保健检查机构而言意义重大。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号