首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Surgical Oncology: The Journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology >Peritoneal carcinomatosis and liver metastases from colorectal cancer treated with cytoreductive surgery perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy and liver resection.
【24h】

Peritoneal carcinomatosis and liver metastases from colorectal cancer treated with cytoreductive surgery perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy and liver resection.

机译:大肠癌的腹膜癌变和肝转移,采用细胞减灭术围手术期腹腔内化疗和肝切除术治疗。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: An aggressive therapy comprising of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (PIC) and liver resection/ablation is generally not offered to patients with both colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis (CRPC) and liver metastases (LM) as it no longer represents a loco-regional disease. We review the outcomes of patients who underwent an aggressive treatment with a curative intent for both CRPC and LM as a prelude towards determining the suitability of this treatment. METHODS: Patients with CRPC were treated with cytoreductive surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy in our institution. Patients with LM underwent additional treatment of liver resection/ablation. The characteristics and survival of patients with isolated CRPC and those with both CRPC and LM were compared. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients underwent complete cytoreductive surgery for treatment of CRPC, amongst which 16 patients had LM. The overall median survival was 36 months. Fourteen of the 16 patients treated for CRPC and LM underwent synchronous treatment. When patients with CRPC alone or CRPC with LM were compared, patients with CRPC and LM had a lower PCI (p=0.03), received less HIPEC infusion (p<0.001), received less of both HIPEC and EPIC infusion (p=0.007), had a shorter procedural duration (p=0.001) and required less blood transfusion (p=0.02). There was no difference in survival between patients who had CRPC alone or CRPC with LM who underwent aggressive treatment (p=0.77). CONCLUSIONS: A curative procedure may be offered to selected patients with CRPC and LM, especially in those with a low peritoneal cancer index.
机译:背景:大肠癌腹膜癌病(CRPC)和肝转移瘤(LM)的患者通常不提供由细胞减灭术(CRS)和围手术期腹膜内化疗(PIC)和肝切除/消融术组成的积极疗法,因为它不再代表肝癌局部疾病。我们回顾了接受积极治疗且对CRPC和LM均具有治愈意图的患者的结局,以此作为确定该治疗方法是否合适的序言。方法:对我院CRPC患者行减瘤手术和围手术期腹腔内化疗。 LM患者接受了肝切除/消融的其他治疗。比较了孤立的CRPC患者以及CRPC和LM患者的特征和生存率。结果:55例接受了完整的细胞减灭术治疗CRPC,其中16例患有LM。总体中位生存期为36个月。在接受CRPC和LM治疗的16例患者中,有14例接受了同步治疗。比较单独使用CRPC或LM的CRPC患者时,CRPC和LM患者的PCI较低(p = 0.03),接受HIPEC输液的患者较少(p <0.001),接受HIPEC和EPIC输液的患者较少(p = 0.007) ,具有较短的手术时间(p = 0.001),并且需要较少的输血(p = 0.02)。单独接受CRPC或接受积极治疗的LM CRPC患者的生存率无差异(p = 0.77)。结论:可以为选定的CRPC和LM患者提供治愈方法,尤其是那些腹膜癌指数低的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号