首页> 外文期刊>Mineral Law Newsletter >Deed Containing Two 'Subject To' Clauses Held Ambiguous
【24h】

Deed Containing Two 'Subject To' Clauses Held Ambiguous

机译:包含两个“对象”条款的契据含糊不清

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The court in Gore Oil Co. v. Roosth, 158 S.W.3d 596 (Tex. App.--Eastland 2005, no pet. h.), construed a general warranty deed from Peyton McKnight, predecessor to the plaintiffs interests, to Eagle Investment Company, conveying the tract in question. Following the granting language and land descriptions were two clauses that generated the dispute: Grantor unto himself, his heirs and assigns, reserves free of all liens a full one-eighth (1/8) non-participating royalty interest in the Property subject to any previously conveyed or reserved mineral interest as may appear of record in Knox County, Texas. This conveyance is made and accepted subject to all restrictions, reservations, covenants, conditions, rights-of-way and easements now outstanding and of record, if any, in Knox County, Texas, affecting the above described property.
机译:戈尔石油公司(Gore Oil Co.)诉罗斯(Roosth)案,158 SW3d 596(Tex。App。--Eastland 2005,no pet。h。)解释了由Peyton McKnight(作为原告利益的前身)授予Eagle Investment的一般保证书公司,传达有关问题。继授予语言和土地描述之后,引发争议的有两个条款:授予人对其本人,其继承人和受让人的所有权,不留所有留置权,保留该财产的全部八分之一(1/8)非参与特许权使用费,但以以前传达或保留的矿产利益,可能在德克萨斯州诺克斯县有记载。在德克萨斯州诺克斯县进行并已接受并遵守所有目前尚未完成并已记录在案的所有限制,保留,契约,条件,通行权和地役权(如果有的话)的情况下,进行并接受了上述财产。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号