首页> 外文期刊>Midwifery >Perinatal mortality rate in the Netherlands compared to other European countries: A secondary analysis of Euro-PERISTAT data
【24h】

Perinatal mortality rate in the Netherlands compared to other European countries: A secondary analysis of Euro-PERISTAT data

机译:荷兰与其他欧洲国家相比的围产期死亡率:Euro-PERISTAT数据的二次分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective: the poor perinatal mortality ranking of the Netherlands compared to other European countries has led to questioning the safety of primary care births, particularly those at home. Primary care births are only planned at term. We therefore examined to which extent the perinatal mortality rate at term in the Netherlands contributes to its poor ranking. Design: secondary analyses using published data from the Euro-PERISTAT study. Setting and participants: women that gave birth in 2004 in the 29 European regions and countries called 'countries' included in the Euro-PERISTAT study (4,328,441 women in total and 1,940,977 women at term). Methods: odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for the comparison of perinatal mortality rates between European countries and the Netherlands, through logistic regression analyses using summary country data. Main outcome measures: combined perinatal mortality rates overall and at term. Perinatal deaths below 28 weeks, between 28 and 37 weeks and from 37 weeks onwards per 1000 total births. Findings: compared to the Netherlands, perinatal mortality rates at term were significantly higher for Denmark and Latvia and not significantly different compared to seven other countries. Eleven countries had a significantly lower rate, and for eight the term perinatal mortality rate could not be compared. The Netherlands had the highest number of perinatal deaths before 28 weeks per 1000 total births (4.3). Key conclusions: the relatively high perinatal mortality rate in the Netherlands is driven more by extremely preterm births than births at term. Although the PERISTAT data cannot be used to show that the Dutch maternity care system is safe, neither should they be used to argue that the system is unsafe. The PERISTAT data alone do not support changes to the Dutch maternity care system that reduce the possibility for women to choose a home birth while benefits of these changes are uncertain.
机译:目的:与其他欧洲国家相比,荷兰的围产期死亡率排名较差,这使人们对初级保健婴儿,特别是在家中的婴儿的安全性提出质疑。初级保健仅在足月分娩。因此,我们研究了荷兰足月围产期死亡率在多大程度上导致了其不良排名。设计:使用Euro-PERISTAT研究的已发布数据进行二级分析。背景和参与者:Euro-PERISTAT研究中2004年在29个欧洲地区和国家(称为“国家”)出生的妇女(总计4,328,441名妇女,足额1,940,977名妇女)。方法:通过使用汇总国家数据进行的逻辑回归分析,计算比值比和95%置信区间,以比较欧洲国家和荷兰之间的围产期死亡率。主要结局指标:整体和足月的围产期综合死亡率。每1000例总出生数低于28周,在28至37周之间以及从37周开始的围产期死亡。调查结果:与荷兰相比,丹麦和拉脱维亚的足月围产期死亡率明显更高,与其他七个国家相比则无显着差异。有11个国家的死亡率显着降低,无法比较八个国家的围产期死亡率。荷兰每1000例总出生28周前的围产期死亡人数最高(4.3)。重要结论:荷兰相对较高的围产期死亡率更多是由极早产而不是足月出生引起的。尽管不能使用PERISTAT数据来表明荷兰的产妇保健系统是安全的,但也不应使用它们来论证该系统是不安全的。仅PERISTAT数据不能支持荷兰产妇保健系统的变化,因为这些变化的好处尚不确定,因此减少了妇女选择家庭生育的可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号