...
首页> 外文期刊>Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology. >A randomized phase III study of adjuvant platinum/docetaxel chemotherapy with or without radiation therapy in patients with gastric cancer.
【24h】

A randomized phase III study of adjuvant platinum/docetaxel chemotherapy with or without radiation therapy in patients with gastric cancer.

机译:胃癌患者接受或不接受放射治疗的铂/多西他赛辅助化疗的随机III期研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The optimal adjuvant treatment for gastric cancer remains controversial. We compared the efficacy of a docetaxel and platinum adjuvant chemotherapy regimen, in patients with high-risk gastric cancer, with that of the same chemotherapy plus radiation therapy (RT). In addition, we evaluated the prognostic and/or predictive value of a panel of molecular markers. Patients with histologically proven, radically resected gastric cancer, stage > or =T3 and/or N+ were randomized to 6 cycles of docetaxel with cisplatin, both at 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks (arm A) or the same treatment with RT (arm B; 45 Gy). Due to excessive nausea and vomiting, cisplatin was substituted by carboplatin at AUC (area under the curve) of 5 after the first 45 patients (22 group A, 23 group B). The prognostic value of EGFR, ERCC1, HER2, MET/HGFR, MAP-Tau, and PTEN expression was also studied in a subset of 67 patients using immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays (TMAs). A total of 147 patients were randomized. After a median follow-up of 53.7 months, no differences in overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were found between the two arms. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities for arms A and B (excluding alopecia) were non-febrile neutropenia (11 and 17%, respectively), febrile neutropenia (9 and 7%) and diarrhea (7 and 4%, respectively). Patients with ERCC1 positive tumors had significantly longer median DFS (33.1 vs. 11.8 months, Wald P = 0.016) and OS (63.2 vs. 18.8 months, Wald P = 0.046). Our results indicate that the addition of RT to platinum/docetaxel adjuvant chemotherapy does not appear to improve survival in high-risk, radically resected gastric cancer. However, the possibility that a benefit by the addition of RT was not detected due to decreased power of the study should not be excluded.
机译:胃癌的最佳辅助治疗仍存在争议。我们比较了多西他赛和铂类辅助化疗方案在高危胃癌患者中的疗效以及相同化疗加放疗(RT)患者的疗效。此外,我们评估了一组分子标记的预后和/或预测价值。经组织学证实,已彻底切除的胃癌,≥T3和/或N +的患者被随机分为6个周期的多西他赛联合顺铂,每3周75 mg / m2(A组)或相同的RT(RT)治疗B; 45 Gy)。由于最初的45例患者(22组A,23组B)在5的AUC(曲线下面积)处,用过量的恶心和呕吐替代了顺铂。还使用组织微阵列(TMA)免疫组化技术在67名患者中研究了EGFR,ERCC1,HER2,MET / HGFR,MAP-Tau和PTEN表达的预后价值。总共147例患者被随机分组​​。中位随访53.7个月后,两组之间的总体(OS)和无病生存期(DFS)没有差异。 A组和B组(不包括脱发)最常见的3/4级毒性是非发热性中性粒细胞减少(分别为11和17%),发热性中性粒细胞减少(分别为9和7%)和腹泻(分别为7%和4%)。 ERCC1阳性肿瘤患者的中位DFS(33.1比11.8个月,Wald P = 0.016)和OS(63.2比18.8个月,Wald P = 0.046)明显更长。我们的结果表明,在铂/多西他赛辅助化疗中添加RT似乎不能改善高危,根治性胃癌的生存率。但是,不应排除由于研究功效降低而未发现因添加RT而获益的可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号