首页> 外文期刊>Cancer causes and control: CCC >The impact of a two-versus three-yearly cervical screening interval recommendation on cervical cancer incidence and mortality: An analysis of trends in Australia, New Zealand, and England
【24h】

The impact of a two-versus three-yearly cervical screening interval recommendation on cervical cancer incidence and mortality: An analysis of trends in Australia, New Zealand, and England

机译:三年两次宫颈筛查间隔建议对宫颈癌发生率和死亡率的影响:澳大利亚,新西兰和英国的趋势分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: To assess the impact of cervical screening interval recommendations on cervical cancer incidence and mortality during periods of organized and opportunistic screening in Australia (2-yearly screening interval for organized screening), New Zealand (3 yearly interval for organized screening), and England (3/5 yearly interval for organized screening). Methods: Changes in cervical cancer rates over two 10-year periods were assessed in each country among women aged 20-69 years using a standardized rate ratio (SRR). The SRR for opportunistic screening was calculated from 1973-1977 to 1983-1987 (mortality only), and for organized screening from 1993-1997 to 2003-2007 (mortality and incidence). Results: During the period of opportunistic cervical screening, mortality reduced by 24 % in Australia and 10 % in England and Wales [Australia: SRR 0.76 (95 % CI 0.71-0.83); England and Wales: SRR 0.90 (95 % CI 0.87-0.93)]; no statistically significant reduction was observed in New Zealand [SRR 0.95 (95 % CI 0.82-1.11)]. After the introduction of organized screening, mortality reduced 39-45 % in each country [Australia: SRR 0.56 (95 % CI 0.51-0.62); New Zealand: SRR 0.53 (95 % CI 0.44-0.63); England and Wales: SRR 0.61 (95 % CI 0.58-0.64)], while incidence reduced 19-38 % [New Zealand: SRR 0.62 (95 % CI 0.56-0.69); Australia: SRR 0.64 (95 % CI 0.61-0.72); England: SRR 0.81 (95 % CI 0.78-0.83)]. Conclusion: In the era of opportunistic screening, some reductions were observed in cervical cancer mortality rates, but these were relatively modest and seen inconsistently between countries. After the introduction of organized cervical screening, cervical cancer mortality rates fell by a similar amount (~40 % or more) in all countries, and incidence fell by more than a third in Australia and New Zealand and by approximately one-fifth in England. Although several factors are likely to have influenced these observed reductions in cervical cancer rates, these findings do not support the more frequent 2-yearly cervical screening interval recommendation in Australia.
机译:目的:评估在澳大利亚(有组织筛查的每两年一次筛查间隔),新西兰(有组织筛查的每三年间隔一次),有组织的机会性筛查期间,子宫颈筛查间隔建议对子宫颈癌发病率和死亡率的影响。 (每年3/5进行有组织筛查的间隔)。方法:使用标准化比率(SRR)评估了每个国家20-69岁女性在两个10年期间的子宫颈癌发病率变化。机会筛查的SRR从1973-1977年至1983-1987年(仅死亡率)计算,而组织筛查的SRR从1993-1997年至2003-2007年(死亡率和发病率)。结果:在机会性宫颈癌筛查期间,澳大利亚的死亡率降低了24%,英格兰和威尔士降低了10%[澳大利亚:SRR 0.76(95%CI 0.71-0.83);英格兰和威尔士:SRR 0.90(95%CI 0.87-0.93)];在新西兰,未观察到统计学上显着的降低[SRR 0.95(95%CI 0.82-1.11)]。引入有组织的筛查后,每个国家的死亡率降低了39-45%[澳大利亚:SRR 0.56(95%CI 0.51-0.62);新西兰:SRR 0.53(95%CI 0.44-0.63);英格兰和威尔士:SRR 0.61(95%CI 0.58-0.64)],而发病率降低了19-38%[新西兰:SRR 0.62(95%CI 0.56-0.69);澳大利亚:SRR 0.64(95%CI 0.61-0.72);英格兰:SRR 0.81(95%CI 0.78-0.83)。结论:在机会性筛查时代,宫颈癌的死亡率有所降低,但相对较低,各国之间的差异并不明显。引入有组织的宫颈癌筛查后,所有国家的宫颈癌死亡率均下降了相似的水平(约40%或更高),澳大利亚和新西兰的发病率下降了三分之一以上,英格兰下降了约五分之一。尽管可能有几个因素影响了这些观察到的宫颈癌发病率下降,但是这些发现并不支持澳大利亚建议的更频繁的2年一次宫颈癌筛查间隔建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号