...
首页> 外文期刊>Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental >Regional abdominal fat distribution in lean and obese thai type 2 diabetic women: Relationships with insulin sensitivity and cardiovascular risk factors.
【24h】

Regional abdominal fat distribution in lean and obese thai type 2 diabetic women: Relationships with insulin sensitivity and cardiovascular risk factors.

机译:肥胖和肥胖的泰国2型糖尿病妇女的腹部腹部脂肪分布:与胰岛素敏感性和心血管危险因素的关系。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To determine the relationships of body fat distribution and insulin sensitivity and cardiovascular risk factors in lean and obese Thai type 2 diabetic women, 9 lean and 11 obese subjects, with respective mean age 41.7 +/- 6.3 (SD) and 48.0 +/- 8.5 years, and mean body mass index (BMI) 23.5 +/- 1.8 and 30.3 +/- 3.7 kg/m(2), were studied. The amount of total body fat (TBF) and total abdominal fat (AF) were measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometer, whereas subcutaneous (SAF) and visceral abdominal fat areas (VAF) were measured by computerized tomography (CT) of the abdomen at the L4-L5 level. Insulin sensitivity was determined by euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp. Cardiovascular risk factors, which included fasting and post-glucose challenged plasma glucose and insulin, systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), lipid profile, fibrinogen, and uric acid, were also determined. VAF was inversely correlated with insulin sensitivity as determined by glucose infusion rate (GIR) during the clamp, in both lean (r = -0.8821; P =.009) and obese subjects (r = -0.582; P =.078) independent of percent TBF. SAF and TBF were not correlated with GIR. With regards to cardiovascular risk factors, VAF was correlated with SBP (r = 0.5279; P =.024) and DBP (r = 0.6492; P =.004), fasting insulin (r = 0.7256; P =.001) and uric acid (r = 0.4963; P =.036) after adjustment for percent TBF. In contrast, TBF was correlated with fasting insulin (r = 0.517; P =.023), area under the curve (AUC) of insulin (r = 0.625; P =.004), triglyceride (TG) (r = 0.668; P =.002), and uric acid (r = 0.49; P =.033). GIR was not correlated with any of cardiovascular risk factors independent of VAF. In conclusion, VAF was a strong determinant of insulin sensitivity and several cardiovascular risk factors in both lean and obese Thai type 2 diabetic women.
机译:为了确定瘦弱和肥胖的泰国2型糖尿病女性,9名瘦弱和11名肥胖受试者的体脂分布,胰岛素敏感性和心血管危险因素之间的关系,分别的平均年龄为41.7 +/- 6.3(SD)和48.0 +/- 8.5年和平均体重指数(BMI)23.5 +/- 1.8和30.3 +/- 3.7 kg / m(2)。双能X射线吸收仪测量人体总脂肪(TBF)和腹部总脂肪(AF)的量,皮下(SAF)和内脏腹部脂肪面积(VAF)的电脑断层扫描(CT)测量。腹部处于L4-L5水平。胰岛素敏感性通过正常血糖高胰岛素钳夹测定。还确定了心血管风险因素,包括禁食和葡萄糖激发后的血浆葡萄糖和胰岛素,收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP),脂质分布,纤维蛋白原和尿酸。无论在瘦弱者(r = -0.8821; P = .009)和肥胖者(r = -0.582; P = .078)中,VAF与钳夹期间的葡萄糖输注速率(GIR)所确定的胰岛素敏感性呈负相关。 TBF百分比。 SAF和TBF与GIR无关。关于心血管危险因素,VAF与SBP(r = 0.5279; P = .024)和DBP(r = 0.6492; P = .004),空腹胰岛素(r = 0.7256; P = .001)和尿酸相关。 (r = 0.4963; P = .036)在调整了TBF百分比后。相反,TBF与空腹胰岛素(r = 0.517; P = .023),胰岛素曲线下面积(AUC)(r = 0.625; P = .004),甘油三酸酯(TG)(r = 0.668; P = .002)和尿酸(r = 0.49; P = .033)。 GIR与任何独立于VAF的心血管危险因素均不相关。总之,在泰国的肥胖和肥胖的2型糖尿病女性中,VAF是胰岛素敏感性和几种心血管危险因素的重要决定因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号