...
首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >Comparison of the incidence of emergence agitation and emergence times between desflurane and sevoflurane anesthesia in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Comparison of the incidence of emergence agitation and emergence times between desflurane and sevoflurane anesthesia in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:地氟醚和七氟醚麻醉下儿童出现躁动的发生率和出现时间的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background:The differences in the incidence and severity of emergence agitation (EA) and emergence times between desflurane and sevoflurane anesthesia have not been as clearly elucidated in children as in adults.Methods:The design of the study is a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. The study methodology is based on the Cochrane Review Methods. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify clinical trials comparing the incidence or severity of EA and emergence times in children anesthetized with desflurane or sevoflurane. Two reviewers independently assessed each study according to predefined inclusion criteria and extracted data from each study using a prespecified data extraction form. The data from each study were combined using a fixed effect or random effect model to calculate the pooled risk ratio (RR) or standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Funnel plots were used to assess publication bias. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed.Results:Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Among the 1196 patients in these 14 studies, 588 received desflurane anesthesia and 608 received sevoflurane anesthesia. The incidence of EA was comparable between the 2 groups (pooled RR = 1.21; 95% CI: 0.96-1.53; I-2 = 26%), and so was the severity of EA (EA score) between the 2 groups (SMD = 0.12; 95% CI: -0.02 to 0.27; I-2 = 0%). Extubation and awakening times were shorter in the desflurane group than in the sevoflurane group; the weighted mean differences were -2.21 (95% CI: -3.62 to -0.81; I-2 = 93%) and -2.74 (95% CI: -3.80 to -1.69; I-2 = 85%), respectively. No publication bias was found in the funnel plot. The subgroup analysis based on the type of EA scale showed a higher incidence of EA in the desflurane group than in the sevoflurane group in studies using 3-, 4-, or 5-point EA scales; the pooled RR was 1.38 (95% CI: 1.10-1.73; I-2 = 37%).Conclusion:The incidence and severity of EA were comparable between desflurane and sevoflurane anesthesia in children; however, emergence times, including extubation and awakening times, were shorter in desflurane anesthesia.
机译:背景:地氟醚和七氟醚麻醉之间的急躁情绪(EA)发生率和严重程度以及急诊时间的差异尚未像成年人那样清楚地阐明。方法:本研究的设计是一项荟萃分析的系统评价随机对照试验。研究方法基于Cochrane审查方法。进行了全面的文献检索,以鉴定比较用地氟醚或七氟醚麻醉的儿童中EA的发生率或严重程度以及出现时间的临床试验。两名审阅者根据预定义的纳入标准独立评估了每个研究,并使用预先指定的数据提取表格从每个研究中提取了数据。使用固定效应或随机效应模型合并来自每个研究的数据,以计算合并风险比(RR)或标准化均值差(SMD)和95%置信区间(CI)。漏斗图用于评估出版偏倚。结果:十四项研究符合纳入标准。在这14项研究中的1196例患者中,有588例接受了地氟醚麻醉,而608例接受了七氟醚麻醉。两组的EA发生率相当(合并RR = 1.21; 95%CI:0.96-1.53​​; I-2 = 26%),两组之间EA的严重程度(EA评分)也相当(SMD = 0.12; 95%CI:-0.02至0.27; I-2 = 0%)。地氟醚组的拔管和唤醒时间短于七氟醚组。加权平均差异分别为-2.21(95%CI:-3.62至-0.81; I-2 = 93%)和-2.74(95%CI:-3.80至-1.69; I-2 = 85%)。在漏斗图中未发现发布偏倚。在使用3点,4点或5点EA量表的研究中,基于EA量表类型的亚组分析显示,地氟醚组中EA的发生率高于七氟醚组。结论:儿童地氟烷和七氟醚麻醉的EA发生率和严重程度相当;儿童的总RR为1.38(95%CI:1.10-1.73; I-2 = 37%)。但是,地氟醚麻醉的出现时间(包括拔管和唤醒时间)较短。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号