...
首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >Risk of Type 2 Diabetes in Patients With Nonapnea Sleep Disorders in Using Different Types of Hypnotics A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study
【24h】

Risk of Type 2 Diabetes in Patients With Nonapnea Sleep Disorders in Using Different Types of Hypnotics A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study

机译:基于人群的回顾性队列研究使用不同类型的催眠药的非呼吸暂停睡眠障碍患者的2型糖尿病风险

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There has been insufficient evidence on whether exposure to hypnotics affects the risk of type 2 diabetes (T2DM). The aim of this study was to examine patients with nonapnea sleep disorders using zolpidem, benzodiazepines (BZDs), or a combination of both, and their risk of T2DM.This was a population-based retrospective cohort study using data from 1997 to 2011. Data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database were employed for this study. A total of 45,602 patients with nonapnea sleep disorders and use of hypnotics were identified as the study cohort. The control cohort comprised 40,799 age- and sex-matched patients. We conducted a Cox proportional hazard regression analysis to estimate the effects of hypnotics on risk of T2DM.The overall incidence of T2DM was 20.1 per 1000 person-years for patients using zolpidem, which was significantly higher than that of the control group (11.9 per 1000 person-years). Overall, patients with nonapnea sleep disorders using zolpidem had a higher risk of T2DM compared with patients not using zolpidem and the control cohort (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]=1.41, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.35-1.48). We also observed a significantly higher risk of T2DM in patients with both zolpidem and BZD use (adjusted HR=1.77, 95% CI=1.64-1.91) than that of those without zolpidem use and BZD use.Compared with patients not using hypnotics, patients using zolpidem had a higher risk of developing T2DM; the risk was particularly pronounced in those using both zolpidem and BZDs.
机译:没有足够的证据证明接触催眠药是否会影响2型糖尿病(T2DM)的风险。这项研究的目的是使用唑吡坦,苯二氮卓类药物(BZDs)或两者结合检查非呼吸暂停睡眠障碍患者的T2DM风险。这是一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究,使用了1997年至2011年的数据。来自台湾国民健康保险研究数据库的数据被用于这项研究。共确定了45602名无呼吸暂停睡眠障碍和使用催眠药的患者作为研究队列。对照队列包括40,799名年龄和性别匹配的患者。我们进行了Cox比例风险回归分析,以评估催眠药对T2DM风险的影响。使用唑吡坦的患者,T2DM的总发生率为每1000人年20.1,大大高于对照组(每1000人年11.9)。人年)。总体而言,与未使用唑吡坦和对照组的患者相比,使用唑吡坦的非呼吸暂停睡眠障碍患者发生T2DM的风险更高(调整后的危险比[HR] = 1.41,95%置信区间[CI] = 1.35-1.48)。我们还观察到,同时使用唑吡坦和BZD的患者(调整后的HR = 1.77,95%CI = 1.64-1.91)比不使用唑吡坦和BZD的患者发生T2DM的风险显着更高。使用唑吡坦有更高的患T2DM的风险;在同时使用唑吡坦和BZD的患者中,这种风险尤为明显。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号