...
首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >Risk-adjusted outcomes in Medicare inpatient nephrectomy patients
【24h】

Risk-adjusted outcomes in Medicare inpatient nephrectomy patients

机译:Medicare住院肾切除术患者的风险调整后结局

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Without risk-adjusted outcomes of surgical care across both the inpatient and postacute period of time, hospitals and surgeons cannot evaluate the effectiveness of current performance in nephrectomy and other operations, and will not have objective metrics to gauge improvements from care redesign efforts.We compared risk-adjusted hospital outcomes following elective total and partial nephrectomy to demonstrate differences that can be used to improve care. We used the Medicare Limited Dataset for 2010 to 2012 for total and partial nephrectomy for benign and malignant neoplasms to create prediction models for the adverse outcomes (AOs) of inpatient deaths, prolonged length-of-stay outliers, 90-day postdischarge deaths without readmission, and 90-day relevant readmissions. From the 4 prediction models, total predicted adverse outcomes were determined for each hospital in the dataset that met a minimum of 25 evaluable cases for the study period. Standard deviations (SDs) for each hospital were used to identify specific z-scores. Risk-adjusted adverse outcomes rates were computed to permit benchmarking each hospital's performance against the national standard. Differences between best and suboptimal performing hospitals defined the potential margin of preventable adverse outcomes for this operation.A total of 449 hospitals with 23,477 patients were evaluated. Overall AO rate was 20.8%; 17 hospitals had risk-adjusted AO rates that were 2 SDs poorer than predicted and 8 were 2 SDs better. The top performing decile of hospitals had a risk-adjusted AO rate of 10.2% while the lowest performing decile had 32.1%. With a minimum of 25 cases for each study hospital, no statistically valid improvement in outcomes was seen with increased case volume.Inpatient and 90-day postdischarge risk-adjusted adverse outcomes demonstrated marked variability among study hospitals and illustrate the opportunities for care improvement. This analytic design is applicable for comparing provider performance across a wide array of different inpatient episodes.
机译:如果没有在住院期间和急性期后对手术护理进行风险调整的结果,医院和外科医生就无法评估当前在肾切除术和其他手术中的表现的有效性,并且将没有客观的指标来评估重新设计护理所带来的改善。选择性全肾切除和部分肾切除术后风险调整后的医院结局,以证明可用于改善护理的差异。我们使用2010年至2012年的Medicare Limited数据集进行了良性和恶性肿瘤的全肾和部分肾切除术,以创建住院死亡,长期住院时间延长,出院后90天死亡而无再次住院的不良后果(AO)的预测模型,以及90天的相关重新录取。从这四个预测模型中,确定了在研究期间至少满足25个可评估病例的数据集中各医院的总预测不良后果。使用每家医院的标准差(SD)来识别特定的z得分。计算风险调整后的不良结局发生率,以使每家医院的绩效都能与国家标准进行比较。表现最佳和表现欠佳的医院之间的差异定义了该手术可预防的不良后果的潜在余量。共评估了449家医院,共23477名患者。总AO率为20.8%; 17所医院的风险调整后AO率比预期低2个标准差,而8个好2个标准差。表现最好的医院的风险调整后AO率为10.2%,而表现最差的医院则为32.1%。每家研究医院至少有25例病例,但病例数增加并没有统计学上的有效改善。住院患者和90天出院后风险调整后的不良结局表明研究医院之间存在明显差异,并说明了改善护理的机会。该分析设计适用于比较各种不同住院事件中医疗服务提供者的表现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号