...
首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >Comparison of the risk of left ventricular free wall rupture in Taiwanese patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction undergoing different reperfusion strategies A medical record review study
【24h】

Comparison of the risk of left ventricular free wall rupture in Taiwanese patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction undergoing different reperfusion strategies A medical record review study

机译:台湾ST抬高急性心肌梗死患者不同再灌注策略左心室游离壁破裂风险的比较病历审查研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Ventricular free wall rupture (VFWR) is the second most common cause of death in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Nevertheless, few reports have investigated the factors, including different treatment strategies, associated with VFWR in Taiwanese patients. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the risk of VFWR in Taiwanese patients with acute STEMI who had received primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), rescue PCI, scheduled PCI, thrombolytic therapy, and pharmacologic treatment. In this medical records review study, records of patients with acute STEMI admitted to a regional hospital in south Taiwan between March 1999 and October 2013 were screened. Multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between the risk of VFWR and its independent factors. The overall incidence of VFWR among the 1545 patients with acute STEMI in this study was 1.6%. Compared with primary PCI, the risk of VFWR was significantly higher in patients who had received thrombolysis (adjusted odds ratio=6.83, P=0.003) or pharmacologic treatment alone (adjusted odds ratio=3.68, P=0.014). The risk of VFWR in patients receiving rescue PCI or scheduled PCI was not significantly different from that in patients receiving primary PCI. In addition, older age and Killip class >I were associated with an increased risk of VFWR in patients with acute STEMI, whereas the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors was associated with a lower risk of VFWR. In conclusion, findings from this medical record review study provide support for the use of primary PCI, rescue PCI, and scheduled PCI over thrombolytic therapy and pharmacologic treatment in reducing the risk of VFWR in Taiwanese patients with acute STEMI.
机译:心室游离壁破裂(VFWR)是急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者的第二大常见死亡原因。然而,很少有报道调查台湾患者中VFWR的相关因素,包括不同的治疗策略。因此,本研究的目的是比较台湾原发性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI),抢救性PCI,常规PCI,溶栓治疗和药物治疗的急性STEMI患者的VFWR风险。在这项病历审查研究中,筛选了1999年3月至2013年10月间在台湾南部某地区医院住院的急性STEMI患者的病历。多元逐步logistic回归分析用于评估VFWR风险与其独立因素之间的关联。在这项研究中,在1545例急性STEMI患者中,VFWR的总发生率为1.6%。与原发PCI相比,接受溶栓治疗(调整后的优势比= 6.83,P = 0.003)或单独接受药物治疗(调整后的优势比= 3.68,P = 0.014)的患者发生VFWR的风险明显更高。接受急诊PCI或计划PCI的患者发生VFWR的风险与接受原发PCI的患者无明显差异。此外,年龄较大和Killip> I类与急性STEMI患者的VFWR风险增加相关,而使用血管紧张素转化酶抑制剂与VFWR的风险较低相关。总之,本病历审查研究的结果为在急性STEMI患者中减少冠状动脉搭桥术风险使用溶栓治疗和药物治疗提供了基础PCI,抢救PCI和计划PCI的支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号