首页> 外文期刊>Medical engineering & physics. >Pedicle screw cement augmentation. A mechanical pullout study on different cement augmentation techniques
【24h】

Pedicle screw cement augmentation. A mechanical pullout study on different cement augmentation techniques

机译:椎弓根螺钉水泥增强。不同水泥增强技术的机械拉拔研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Pedicle screws with polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) cement augmentation have been shown to significantly improve the fixation strength in a severely osteoporotic spine. However, the efficacy of screw fixation for different cement augmentation techniques remains unknown. This study aimed to determine the difference in pullout strength between different cement augmentation techniques. Uniform synthetic bones simulating severe osteoporosis were used to provide a platform for each augmentation technique. In all cases a polyaxial screw and acrylic cement (PMMA) at medium viscosity were used. Five groups were analyzed: I) only screw without PMMA (control group); II) retrograde cement pre-filling of the tapped area; III) cannulated and fenestrate screw with cement injection through perforation; IV) injection using a standard trocar of PMMA (vertebroplasty) and retrograde pre-filling of the tapped area; V) injection through a fenestrated trocar and retrograde pre-filling of the tapped area. Standard X-rays were taken in order to visualize cement distribution in each group. Pedicle screws at full insertion were then tested for axial pullout failure using a mechanical testing machine. A total of 30 screws were tested. The results of pullout analysis revealed better results of all groups with respect to the control group. In particular the statistical analysis showed a difference of Group V (p = 0.001) with respect to all other groups. These results confirm that the cement augmentation grants better results in pullout axial forces. Moreover they suggest better load resistance to axial forces when the distribution of the PMMA is along all the screw combining fenestration and pre-filling augmentation technique. (C) 2015 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:椎弓根螺钉与聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)水泥增强术已显示可显着改善严重骨质疏松脊柱的固定强度。然而,对于不同的水泥增强技术,螺钉固定的功效仍然未知。本研究旨在确定不同水泥增强技术之间抗拉强度的差异。模拟严重骨质疏松症的均匀合成骨被用来为每种增强技术提供平台。在所有情况下,均使用中等粘度的多轴螺杆和丙烯酸水泥(PMMA)。分析了五组:I)仅螺钉而没有PMMA(对照组); II)挖掘区域的逆行水泥预填充; III)通过穿孔注入水泥的空心螺钉。 IV)使用标准的PMMA套管针(椎体成形术)注射并逆行预填充螺纹孔区域; V)通过有孔的套管针注射并逆行预填充挖掘区域。进行标准X射线检查以可视化每组中的水泥分布。然后使用机械测试机测试完全插入的椎弓根螺钉的轴向拔出故障。总共测试了30个螺钉。提取分析的结果表明,所有组的结果均优于对照组。特别是,统计分析表明,相对于所有其他组,V组有差异(p = 0.001)。这些结果证实,水泥增强在拔出轴向力方面提供了更好的结果。此外,当结合开窗和预填充增强技术将PMMA分布在所有螺钉上时,它们建议更好地抵抗轴向力。 (C)2015年IPEM。由Elsevier Ltd.出版。保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号