首页> 外文期刊>Medicine studies. >Blessing or Curse? Neurocognitive Enhancement by 'Brain Engineering'
【24h】

Blessing or Curse? Neurocognitive Enhancement by 'Brain Engineering'

机译:祝福还是诅咒?通过“脑工程”提高神经认知能力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose Since the 1980s we have witnessed a soaring "extra-therapeutic" use of psycho-pharmacology. But there is also an increasing interest in invasive methods of neuroenhancement that can be subsumed under the term "brain engineering". The present article aims to identify key issues raised by those forms of neuro-technical enhancement (e.g., deep brain stimulation, brain-computer interfaces, memory chips, neurobionic interventions). First it distinguishes different forms of neuroenhancement, then describes features of those methods and finally discusses their ethical implications.Methods The article is based on an in-depth literature study and an ethical assessment of the current and emerging forms of neuroenhancement. Results From a medical and normative perspective, psycho-pharmacological enhancement and nonphar-macological enhancement by brain engineering demonstrate considerable differences. Many arguments in favour of nonpharmacological enhancement fall short, for they fail to sufficiently consider the medical, anthropological and socio-cultural context. In many respects unsecured use is confronted with considerable risks.
机译:目的自1980年代以来,我们目睹了心理药理学在“额外治疗”中的飞速使用。但是,对于可以归入“脑工程”一词的神经增强的侵入性方法也越来越感兴趣。本文旨在确定由这些形式的神经技术增强(例如深层脑刺激,脑机接口,存储芯片,神经仿生干预)引发的关键问题。首先,它区分了不同形式的神经增强,然后描述了这些方法的特征,最后讨论了它们的伦理意义。方法本文基于对神经增强的当前和新兴形式的深入文献研究和伦理评估。结果从医学和规范的角度来看,脑工程对心理-药理学的促进和非相-macologic的促进表现出相当大的差异。许多主张加强非药物学的论点都没有兑现,因为他们没有充分考虑医学,人类学和社会文化背景。在许多方面,不安全的使用都面临着巨大的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号