...
首页> 外文期刊>Medical Physics >Benchmarking of a treatment planning system for spot scanning proton therapy: Comparison and analysis of robustness to setup errors of photon IMRT and proton SFUD treatment plans of base of skull meningioma
【24h】

Benchmarking of a treatment planning system for spot scanning proton therapy: Comparison and analysis of robustness to setup errors of photon IMRT and proton SFUD treatment plans of base of skull meningioma

机译:斑点扫描质子治疗的治疗计划系统的基准测试:颅脑膜瘤基底光子IMRT和质子SFUD治疗计划建立误差的鲁棒性比较和分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: Base of skull meningioma can be treated with both intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and spot scanned proton therapy (PT). One of the main benefits of PT is better sparing of organs at risk, but due to the physical and dosimetric characteristics of protons, spot scanned PT can be more sensitive to the uncertainties encountered in the treatment process compared with photon treatment. Therefore, robustness analysis should be part of a comprehensive comparison between these two treatment methods in order to quantify and understand the sensitivity of the treatment techniques to uncertainties. The aim of this work was to benchmark a spot scanning treatment planning system for planning of base of skull meningioma and to compare the created plans and analyze their robustness to setup errors against the IMRT technique.Methods: Plans were produced for three base of skull meningioma cases: IMRT planned with a commercial TPS [Monaco (Elekta AB, Sweden)]; single field uniform dose (SFUD) spot scanning PT produced with an in-house TPS (PSI-plan); and SFUD spot scanning PT plan created with a commercial TPS [XiO (Elekta AB, Sweden)]. A tool for evaluating robustness to random setup errors was created and, for each plan, both a dosimetric evaluation and a robustness analysis to setup errors were performed.Results: It was possible to create clinically acceptable treatment plans for spot scanning proton therapy of meningioma with a commercially available TPS. However, since each treatment planning system uses different methods, this comparison showed different dosimetric results as well as different sensitivities to setup uncertainties. The results confirmed the necessity of an analysis tool for assessing plan robustness to provide a fair comparison of photon and proton plans.Conclusions: Robustness analysis is a critical part of plan evaluation when comparing IMRT plans with spot scanned proton therapy plans.
机译:目的:颅脑膜瘤的基础可以使用调强放射治疗(IMRT)和点扫描质子治疗(PT)进行治疗。 PT的主要优点之一是更好地保留了处于危险状态的器官,但是由于质子的物理和剂量学特征,与光子治疗相比,点扫描PT对治疗过程中遇到的不确定性更敏感。因此,稳健性分析应该是这两种处理方法之间全面比较的一部分,以便量化和了解处理技术对不确定性的敏感性。这项工作的目的是对用于颅脑膜瘤基础计划的点扫描治疗计划系统进行基准测试,并比较所创建的计划并分析其稳健性,以针对IMRT技术进行设置。方法:针对三个颅脑膜瘤基础制定了计划案例:通过商业TPS计划进行IMRT [摩纳哥(瑞典Elekta AB)];使用内部TPS(PSI计划)生产的单场均匀剂量(SFUD)点扫描PT;和使用商业TPS [XiO(瑞典Elekta AB,瑞典)创建的SFUD点扫描PT计划。创建了一种评估随机设置错误的鲁棒性的工具,并且针对每个计划都进行了剂量学评估和设置错误的鲁棒性分析。结果:可以为脑膜瘤的斑扫描质子治疗创建临床可接受的治疗计划。市售的TPS。但是,由于每个治疗计划系统使用不同的方法,因此该比较显示出不同的剂量学结果以及对设置不确定性的敏感性。结果证实了评估计划稳健性的分析工具的必要性,以提供光子和质子计划的公平比较。结论:当将IMRT计划与点扫描质子治疗计划进行比较时,稳健性分析是计划评估的关键部分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号