...
首页> 外文期刊>Medical oncology >Impact of age on toxicity and efficacy of sorafenib-targeted therapy in cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
【24h】

Impact of age on toxicity and efficacy of sorafenib-targeted therapy in cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

机译:年龄对肝硬化肝癌患者索拉非尼靶向治疗的毒性和疗效的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is increasing worldwide and the proportion of older patients with HCC is expected to steadily rise in the next years. Sorafenib is the standard of care for patients with advanced HCC but there is a lack of detailed data on how older patients with cirrhosis tolerate this drug. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the impact of age on the effects of sorafenib-targeted therapy in patients with HCC and cirrhosis. We analyzed a consecutive cohort of HCC patients not eligible for surgery or locoregional treatment, with Child-Pugh score ≤ 7, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, treated with sorafenib. Clinical outcomes and treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were compared between younger (< 70 years) and older (≥ 70 years) patients. Overall, 150 patients, 90 in the younger (median age 60 years) and 60 in the older (median age 72 years) group, were evaluated. Treatment duration was 4 months in both groups. The median time to progression and overall survival were longer in older than in younger group (12 vs. 8 months and 16 vs. 12 months, respectively), although the differences did not reach a statistical significance. Grade 3-4 AEs were more frequently observed in younger than in older group (15.7 vs. 9.2 %, respectively; p = .0146). In field practice, sorafenib treatment in elderly patients with cirrhosis and HCC resulted at least as effective and safe as in younger patients. However, severe AEs occurred more frequently in younger patients.
机译:在世界范围内,肝细胞癌(HCC)的发病率正在增加,并且在未来几年中,老年HCC患者的比例有望稳定上升。索拉非尼是晚期肝癌患者的标准治疗方法,但缺乏有关老年肝硬化患者如何耐受该药物的详细数据。因此,我们旨在评估年龄对靶向肝癌和肝硬化患者的索拉非尼靶向治疗效果的影响。我们分析了不符合手术或局部区域治疗的HCC患者的连续队列,Child-Pugh得分≤7,东部合作肿瘤小组的表现为0-1,接受了索拉非尼治疗。比较年轻(<70岁)和年长(≥70岁)患者的临床结局和与治疗相关的不良事件(AE)。总体上,对150例患者进行了评估,其中90例为年轻(中位年龄为60岁),60例为年龄较大(中位年龄为72岁)的患者。两组的治疗时间均为4个月。尽管年龄差异没有达到统计学显着性,但年长者的中位进展时间和总生存时间要比年轻者更长(分别为12个月和8个月,16个月和12个月)。年轻人中较年长者更频繁地观察到3-4级AE(分别为15.7和9.2%; p = .0146)。在现场实践中,索拉非尼治疗老年肝硬化和肝癌的效果至少与年轻患者一样有效和安全。但是,严重的不良事件在年轻患者中更为常见。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号