首页> 外文期刊>Medicine and science in sports and exercise >Influence of cycling cadence on subsequent running performance in triathletes.
【24h】

Influence of cycling cadence on subsequent running performance in triathletes.

机译:自行车节奏对铁人三项运动员随后跑步表现的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of different cycling cadences on metabolic and kinematic parameters during subsequent running. METHODS: Eight triathletes performed two incremental tests (running and cycling) to determine maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) and ventilatory threshold (VT) values, a cycling test to assess the energetically optimal cadence (EOC), three cycle-run succession sessions (C-R, 30-min cycle + 15-min run), and one 45-min isolated run (IR). EOC, C-R, and IR sessions were realized at an intensity corresponding to VT + 5%. During the cycling bouts of C-R sessions, subjects had to maintain one of the three pedaling cadences corresponding to the EOC (72.5 +/- 4.6 rpm), the freely chosen cadence (FCC; 81.2 +/- 7.2 rpm), and the theoretical mechanical optimal cadence (MOC, 90 rpm; Neptune and Hull, 1999). RESULTS: Oxygen uptake (VO2) increased during the 30-min cycling only at MOC (+12.0%) and FCC (+10.4%). During the running periods of C-R sessions, VO2, minute ventilation, and stride-rate values were significantly higher than during the IR session (respectively, +11.7%, +15.7%, and +7.2%). Furthermore, a significant effect of cycling cadence was found on VO2 variability during the 15-min subsequent run only for MOC (+4.1%) and FCC (+3.6%). CONCLUSION: The highest cycling cadences (MOC, FCC) contribute to an increase in energy cost during cycling and the appearance of a VO2 slow component during subsequent running, whereas cycling at EOC leads to a stability in energy cost of locomotion with exercise duration. Several hypotheses are proposed to explain these results such as changes in fiber recruitment or hemodynamic modifications during prolonged exercise.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是研究随后的跑步过程中不同自行车节奏对代谢和运动学参数的影响。方法:八名铁人三项运动员进行了两次增量测试(跑步和骑行),以确定最大摄氧量(VO2max)和通气阈值(VT),进行了一次骑车测试以评估能量最佳踏频(EOC),进行了三个循环跑步过程(CR) ,30分钟的循环+ 15分钟的运行)和一个45分钟的隔离运行(IR)。 EOC,C-R和IR会话的强度相当于VT + 5%。在CR循环中,受试者必须保持对应于EOC(72.5 +/- 4.6 rpm),自由选择的节奏(FCC; 81.2 +/- 7.2 rpm)和理论机械强度的三个踩踏节奏之一。最佳节奏(MOC,90 rpm; Neptune and Hull,1999)。结果:仅在MOC(+ 12.0%)和FCC(+ 10.4%)的情况下,在30分钟循环中的摄氧量(VO2)增加。在C-R阶段的跑步期间,VO2,分钟通气和步幅值显着高于IR阶段(分别为+11.7%,+ 15.7%和+ 7.2%)。此外,在MOC(+ 4.1%)和FCC(+ 3.6%)的随后15分钟内,骑车节奏对VO2变异性有显着影响。结论:最高的骑车节奏(MOC,FCC)会导致骑车过程中的能量消耗增加,并且在随后的跑步过程中会出现VO2慢成分,而在EOC处骑车会导致运动的能量消耗与运动时间保持稳定。提出了几种假设来解释这些结果,例如长时间运动过程中纤维募集的变化或血液动力学改变。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号