首页> 外文期刊>British journal of anaesthesia >Rational fluid management: Dissecting facts from fiction
【24h】

Rational fluid management: Dissecting facts from fiction

机译:合理的流体管理:从小说中剖析事实

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the Sceptic's Medical Dictionary,1 an iconoclastic book we highly recommend, Michael O'Donnell defines clinical experience as 'Making the same mistakes with increasing confidence over an impressive number of years'. Although provocative, this statement is sometimes not so far from reality when considering intra- and postoperative fluid management. For decades, the decision to give fluid was based on clinical examination, heart rate, and arterial pressure, for example, a high heart rate and low arterial pressure often triggering a fluid bolus, when not simply based on the gut feeling of the good doctor. Unfortunately, tachycardia and hypotension are not specific and sensitive markers of hypovolaemia. Many studies have also demonstrated the limited value of cardiac filling pressures to predict fluid responsiveness.
机译:在我们极力推荐的《怀疑论者医学词典》 1中,迈克尔·奥唐纳(Michael O'Donnell)将临床经验定义为“在令人印象深刻的几年中不断犯同样的错误并充满信心”。尽管具有挑衅性,但在考虑术中和术后输液管理时,有时这种陈述与现实并不遥远。几十年来,决定是否输液是基于临床检查,心率和动脉压,例如,高心率和低动脉压常常触发液体推注,而不仅仅是基于好医生的肠胃感觉。不幸的是,心动过速和低血压不是低血容量的特异性和敏感标志。许多研究还证明了心脏充盈压在预测液体反应性方面的价值有限。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号