首页> 外文期刊>Medical education >Medical students learning intimate examinations without valid consent: a multicentre study.
【24h】

Medical students learning intimate examinations without valid consent: a multicentre study.

机译:医科学生未经有效同意即可学习内科检查:一项多中心研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objectives: This study aimed to explore medical students' explanations of their behaviour when instructed to observe or perform intimate examinations or procedures without valid patient consent. METHODS: We used a qualitative design employing individual and group interviews to elicit narratives of dilemmas associated with professionalism. Qualitative thematic analyses of narratives were followed by a qualitative and quantitative analysis using a validated coding scheme of students' explanations of their behaviours within dilemmas involving intimate examinations carried out without valid consent. Participants (n=200) were medical students drawn from each academic year of three medical schools, representing two 5-year undergraduate programmes and one 4-year graduate-entry programme in England, Wales and Australia. RESULTS: Of 833 narratives collected, 112 involved dilemmas associated with intimate examinations. Of these, 63% (n=71) described dilemmas which came about because students were instructed to observe or perform intimate examinations or procedures without valid consent. A total of 82% (n=58) involved students complying with instructions and contained 349 distinct explanations. Thirteen narratives described cases in which students had refused to comply and contained 84 explanations. A high proportion of explanations of compliance included statements by students that they 'had to' observe or perform the examination or procedure. Explanations of compliance behaviours significantly downplayed the intentionality of actions, whereas explanations of refusal emphasised intentionality (chi(2)=14.225, d.f.=2, p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite clear policies at each school, students in all schools observed or performed intimate examinations or procedures without having gained valid consent from the patient. Faculty development initiatives are clearly essential to help clinical teachers put intimate examination policy into practice.
机译:目的:本研究旨在探讨医学生在未经有效的患者同意的情况下应指导观察或进行深入的检查或操作时对其行为的解释。方法:我们采用定性设计,采用个人和小组访谈的方式来叙述与专业相关的困境。对叙事进行定性主题分析,然后使用经过验证的编码方案对学生的叙事进行定性和定量分析,以解释学生在两难困境中对其行为的解释,其中包括未经有效同意而进行的深入检查。参加者(n = 200)是来自三所医学院校每个学年的医学生,分别代表英格兰,威尔士和澳大利亚的两个5年制本科课程和一个4年制研究生入学课程。结果:在收集的833篇叙述中,有112篇涉及与亲密检查相关的难题。在这些人中,有63%(n = 71)描述了困境,这是由于学生未经有效同意而被指示去观察或进行深入的检查或程序而发生的。共有82%(n = 58)的学生遵守教学规定,并包含349种不同的解释。十三种叙述描述了学生拒绝遵守的情况,并包含84种解释。对合规性的大部分解释包括学生“必须”遵守或执行考试或程序的陈述。对顺从行为的解释大大淡化了行动的意图,而对拒绝的解释则强调了意图(chi(2)= 14.225,d.f. = 2,p = 0.001)。结论:尽管每所学校都有明确的政策,但所有学校的学生在未征得患者有效同意的情况下仍观察或进行了详细的检查或程序。教职员工的发展举措显然对帮助临床教师将亲密考试政策付诸实践至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号