首页> 外文期刊>Medical education >Student sceptics: key partners for teaching professionalism
【24h】

Student sceptics: key partners for teaching professionalism

机译:学生怀疑论者:教授专业知识的主要合作伙伴

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Context and setting This report focuses on the significance of a student advisory committee as astrategy for supporting and evaluating a curriculum that focuses on professional formation as a doctor and a method for teaching about professional practice.After a year of operating the new 'Professional Competency Curriculum' (ProComp) at McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, it appeared that there was a significant gap between the acceptance of the new programme by its 'longitudinal facilitators' (a newly created role) and the students themselves. The experienced clinician pairs who facilitated the weekly sessions with groups of 10 students readily grasped the significance of ethics, communication skills, self-awareness and population health (some of the core pillars of ProComp) to successful clinical practice. However, students early in their; training had more difficulty with the relevance of these topics and were often frustrated by what they perceived as 'soft' content competing for time with 'hard'sciences.
机译:背景和背景本报告着重介绍了一个学生咨询委员会作为支持和评估以医生为专业组成的课程以及教授专业实践的方法的策略的重要性。经过一年的运作,新的“专业能力课程” ”(ProComp)位于安大略省汉密尔顿的麦克马斯特大学,看来“纵向协助者”(新创建的角色)对新计划的接受与学生本身之间存在很大差距。经验丰富的临床医师对与每周10名学生组成的小组进行了每周一次的会议,他们很容易理解道德,沟通技巧,自我意识和人口健康(ProComp的某些核心支柱)对成功临床实践的重要性。但是,学生早于他们。培训在这些主题的相关性上更加困难,并且常常被他们认为是“软”内容与“硬”科学竞争时间而感到沮丧。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号