首页> 外文期刊>Medical education >Development of a teaching style inventory for tutor evaluation in problem-based learning.
【24h】

Development of a teaching style inventory for tutor evaluation in problem-based learning.

机译:开发一种教学风格的清单,用于基于问题的学习中的导师评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a self-rating instrument to assess teaching styles among tutors in problem-based learning (PBL). METHODS: The development of the teaching style inventory (TSI) was based theoretically on four types of teaching behaviours: the assertive, suggestive, collaborative and facilitative styles, as proposed by Bibace et al. A 35-item questionnaire was generated and evaluated for content validity by a group of experienced tutors. The questionnaire was mailed to 196 tutors at the National Taiwan University College of Medicine. The results were submitted for item analysis, internal consistency testing and exploratory factor analysis. Longterm test-retest reliability was assessed by a sample of 50 tutors after a 6-month interval. RESULTS: Finally, 118 tutors returned the questionnaires. In the item reduction process, seven items were excluded due to low interscale correlation. Principle component factoring yielded a three-factor solution that accounted for 48.5% of the total variance. Internal consistency coefficients of the four hypothetical domains ranged from 0.73 to 0.83. All domains correlated to each other as expected. Assertive and facilitative styles, which are theoretically opposite teaching styles, showed a negative correlation with each other. Most of the items of each hypothetical domain correlated better with their own domain than with other domains. Longterm test-retest correlations of the four domains ranged from 0.54 to 0.81. CONCLUSION: The TSI demonstrated high internal consistency reliability, acceptable longterm test-retest reliability, and construct validity. Further psychometric testing should focus on applicability to other populations, predictive validity and short-term test-retest reliability. This instrument can be used by programme directors for the recruitment of tutors and can also be used to increase the self-awareness of tutors.
机译:目的:开发和验证一种自评工具,以评估基于问题的学习(PBL)中的导师之间的教学风格。方法:教学风格清单(TSI)的发展理论上是基于四种类型的教学行为:Bibace等人提出的自信,暗示,协作和促进风格。生成了35项问卷,并由一组经验丰富的导师评估了内容的有效性。问卷已寄给国立台湾大学医学院的196名导师。结果提交给项目分析,内部一致性测试和探索性因素分析。在六个月的时间间隔后,由50名导师组成的样本评估了长期重测的可靠性。结果:最终,有118名家庭教师返回了问卷。在项目减少过程中,由于尺度间相关性低,排除了七个项目。主成分分解产生了三因子解,占总方差的48.5%。四个假设域的内部一致性系数范围为0.73至0.83。所有域都按预期相互关联。理论上与教学风格相反的主张和促进风格之间存在负相关关系。每个假设域的大多数项目与自己的域相关性比与其他域更好。四个域的长期重测相关性介于0.54至0.81之间。结论:TSI具有较高的内部一致性可靠性,可接受的长期重测信度和结构效度。进一步的心理测验应侧重于对其他人群的适用性,预测效度和短期重测信度。程序主管可以使用此工具来招聘导师,也可以用来增强导师的自我意识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号