Exit learning outcomes for the PRHO year: an evidence base for informed decisions.

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate potential learning outcomes for pre-registration house officer (PRHO) training and develop an evidence base for informed decision making. DESIGN AND SETTING: A 2-stage Delphi process was employed to establish the opinions of Scottish stakeholders with regard to learning outcomes for the PRHO year. PARTICIPANTS: Doctors involved in the provision of PRHO training, including deans, postgraduate tutors and general practitioners (GPs) with trainees, were invited to participate in the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Respondents rated a range of outcomes according to which they believed should be included or excluded from the PRHO training year. RESULTS: Learning outcomes identified for PRHOs were grouped under the 12-domain framework of the 3-circle model: 'What the doctor can do', 'How they approach their practice' and 'Their professionalism'. Based on the consensus opinions gained in the Delphi study, the ratings were classified into priority groupings. Priority 1 contained 45 of the original 81 learning outcomes, representing each area of the 3-circle model, with emphasis on the domains of clinical skills, patient investigation/management, communication, appropriate attitudes and personal development. Health promotion and disease prevention was the only domain not represented at priority 1. Priority 2 contained 24 outcomes with emphasis on the understanding of clinical skills, patient management and personal development. Priority 3 contained 12 outcomes indicating a lack of emphasis for some outcomes, particularly the role of the doctor and health promotion. CONCLUSION: Consensus on the learning outcomes for PRHO training has been achieved, providing an evidence base for curriculum planning. The relative priority assigned to these outcomes can facilitate the use of the evidence. This evidence base should be referred to when reviewing any PRHO training programme.