...
首页> 外文期刊>Medical dosimetry: official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists >Clinical Evaluation of Direct Aperture Optimization When Applied to Head-And-Neck IMRT.
【24h】

Clinical Evaluation of Direct Aperture Optimization When Applied to Head-And-Neck IMRT.

机译:直接光圈优化应用于头颈IMRT的临床评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Direct Machine Parameter Optimization (DMPO) is a leaf segmentation program released as an optional item of the Pinnacle planning system (Philips Radiation Oncology Systems, Milpitas, CA); it is based on the principles of direct aperture optimization where the size, shape, and weight of individual segments are optimized to produce an intensity modulated radiation treatment (IMRT) plan. In this study, we compare DMPO to the traditional method of IMRT planning, in which intensity maps are optimized prior to conversion into deliverable multileaf collimator (MLC) apertures, and we determine if there was any dosimetric improvement, treatment efficiency gain, or planning advantage provided by the use of DMPO. Eleven head-and-neck patients treated with IMRT had treatment plans generated using each optimization method. For each patient, the same planning parameters were used for each optimization method. All calculations were performed using Pinnacle version 7.6c software and treatments were delivered using a step-and-shoot IMRT method on a Varian 2100EX linear accelerator equipped with a 120-leaf Millennium MLC (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA). Each plan was assessed based on the calculation time, a conformity index, the composite objective value used in the optimization, the number of segments, monitor units (MUs), and treatment time. The results showed DMPO to be superior to the traditional optimization method in all areas. Considerable advantages were observed in the dosimetric quality of DMPO plans, which also required 32% less time to calculate, 42% fewer MUs, and 35% fewer segments than the conventional optimization method. These reductions translated directly into a 29% decrease in treatment times. While considerable gains were observed in planning and treatment efficiency, they were specific to our institution, and the impact of direct aperture optimization on plan quality and workflow will be dependent on the planning parameters, planning system, and linear accelerators used by a particular institution.
机译:直接机器参数优化(DMPO)是叶分割程序,作为Pinnacle规划系统(菲利普斯放射肿瘤系统,加利福尼亚州米尔皮塔斯)的可选项目发布;它基于直接孔径优化的原理,其中对各个段的大小,形状和重量进行了优化,以生成强度调制的放射治疗(IMRT)计划。在这项研究中,我们将DMPO与传统的IMRT规划方法进行了比较,在传统的IMRT规划方法中,强度图在转换为可交付使用的多叶准直器(MLC)孔径之前已进行了优化,并确定是否在剂量学方面有所改善,治疗效率提高或规划优势通过使用DMPO提供。接受IMRT治疗的11例头颈部患者都有使用每种优化方法生成的治疗计划。对于每个患者,每种优化方法均使用相同的计划参数。所有计算均使用Pinnacle 7.6c版软件进行,并在IMAGE方法上采用分步即拍IMRT方法,该方法在配备120叶Millennium MLC的Varian 2100EX线性加速器(加利福尼亚州帕洛阿尔托的Varian Medical Systems)上进行。根据计算时间,合格指数,优化中使用的综合目标值,段数,监视单元(MU)和处理时间对每个计划进行评估。结果表明,DMPO在所有方面均优于传统的优化方法。与传统的优化方法相比,DMPO计划的剂量质量具有明显优势,与传统的优化方法相比,该计划所需的计算时间减少了32%,MU减少了42%,段减少了35%。这些减少直接转化为治疗时间减少了29%。尽管在计划和处理效率方面观察到了可观的收益,但收益是特定于我们机构的,直接孔径优化对计划质量和工作流程的影响将取决于计划参数,计划系统和特定机构使用的线性加速器。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号