...
首页> 外文期刊>Medical care research and review: MCRR >Cost-Sharing, Physician Utilization, and Adverse Selection Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Chronic Health Conditions
【24h】

Cost-Sharing, Physician Utilization, and Adverse Selection Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Chronic Health Conditions

机译:慢性健康状况下的医疗保险受益人中的费用分摊,医师利用和不良选择

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Pooled data from the 2007, 2009, and 2011/2012 California Health Interview Surveys were used to compare the number of self-reported annual physician visits among 36,808 Medicare beneficiaries 65 in insurance groups with differential cost-sharing. Adjusted for adverse selection and a set of health covariates, Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) only beneficiaries had similar physician utilization compared with HMO enrollees but fewer visits compared with those with supplemental (1.04, p = .001) and Medicaid (1.55, p = .003) coverage. FFS only beneficiaries in very good or excellent health had fewer visits compared with those of similar health status with supplemental (1.30, p = .001) or Medicaid coverage (2.15, p = .002). For subpopulations with several chronic conditions, FFS only beneficiaries also had fewer visits compared with beneficiaries with supplemental or Medicaid coverage. Observed differences in utilization may reflect efficient and necessary physician utilization among those with chronic health needs.
机译:来自2007年,2009年和2011/2012年加州健康访问调查的汇总数据用于比较分摊费用分摊的保险组中36,808名Medicare受益人65中自我报告的年度医师就诊次数。经过针对逆向选择和一组健康协变量进行调整后,与HMO参保人相比,仅Medicare服务付费(FFS)受益人的医师利用率相似,但与补充(1.04,p = .001)和Medicaid(1.55)的人就诊次数较少,p = .003)覆盖率。与具有类似健康状况的补充(1.30,p = .001)或医疗补助(2.15,p = .002)相比,只有FFS处于良好或良好状态的受益者的就诊次数较少。对于具有几种慢性病的亚人群,与补充或医疗补助覆盖的受益人相比,只有FFS的受益人的出诊次数也要少。观察到的利用率差异可能反映了有长期健康需求的医生的有效和必要的利用率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号