首页> 外文期刊>Medical care >Health values of patients coinfected with HIV/hepatitis C: are two viruses worse than one?
【24h】

Health values of patients coinfected with HIV/hepatitis C: are two viruses worse than one?

机译:合并感染艾滋病毒/丙型肝炎的患者的健康价值:两种病毒比一种病毒差吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess health values of patients coinfected with HIV/hepatitis C (HCV) and compare them with those of patients singly infected with HIV or HCV and to characterize and assess the relationship of clinical and nonhealth-related factors with health values. SUBJECTS: We studied a total of 203 subjects infected with HIV, HCV, or both. MEASURES: We assessed rating scale (RS), time tradeoff (TTO), and standard gamble (SG) values, and we explored associations of health values with the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and Physical Component Summary (PCS) of the SF-12; number of bothersome symptoms from the HIV Symptoms Index; spirituality, as assessed by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy, Spiritual Well-being scale; as well as with a number of demographic, clinical, and psychosocial characteristics. RESULTS: Of the 203 subjects, 59 (29%) had HIV monoinfection, 69 (34%) had HCV monoinfection, and 75 (37%) were coinfected. The mean (SD) health values for the cohort were: RS = 0.69 (0.23), TTO= 0.88 (0.24), and SG = 0.78 (0.30). Infection type was related, albeit differently, to TTO values (mean values for patients with coinfection = 0.82; HIV = 0.91; and HCV = 0.91 [P < 0.05]) and SG values (coinfection = 0.77; HIV = 0.70; and HCV = 0.87; P < 0.05). In multivariable models, RS scores were significantly associated with sexual orientation, PCS scores, MCS scores, symptoms, and spirituality (adjusted R = 0.61); TTO with symptoms and spirituality (adjusted R = 0.23); and SG with infection type, PCS scores, and symptoms (adjusted R = 0.24). CONCLUSIONS: Health values and their correlates varied by method of assessment. Health values appear to be driven more by symptoms, health status, and spirituality than by number of viral infections.
机译:目的:我们试图评估合并感染HIV /丙型肝炎(HCV)的患者的健康价值,并将其与单独感染HIV或HCV的患者的健康价值进行比较,以表征和评估临床和非健康相关因素与健康价值之间的关系。受试者:我们研究了总共203名感染了HIV,HCV或两者的受试者。措施:我们评估了评分量表(RS),时间折衷(TTO)和标准赌博(SG)值,并探索了健康值与SF-的心理成分摘要(MCS)和身体成分摘要(PCS)的关联。 12; HIV症状指数中令人讨厌的症状数量;精神病,由慢性病治疗功能评估,精神健康量表评估;以及许多人口,临床和社会心理特征。结果:在203名受试者中,有59名(29%)患有HIV单发感染,有69名(34%)患有HCV单发感染,有75名(37%)被并发感染。该队列的平均(SD)健康值为:RS = 0.69(0.23),TTO = 0.88(0.24)和SG = 0.78(0.30)。感染类型与TTO值(合并感染患者的平均值= 0.82; HIV = 0.91; HCV = 0.91 [P <0.05])和SG值(合并感染= 0.77; HIV = 0.70; HCV = 0.87; P <0.05)。在多变量模型中,RS评分与性取向,PCS评分,MCS评分,症状和灵性显着相关(校正后R = 0.61);具有症状和灵性的TTO(调整后的R = 0.23);以及具有感染类型,PCS评分和症状的SG(校正后R = 0.24)。结论:健康价值及其相关性因评估方法而异。健康价值似乎更多地是由症状,健康状况和灵性所驱动,而不是由病毒感染的数量所驱动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号