...
首页> 外文期刊>Medical care >Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data.
【24h】

Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data.

机译:用于定义ICD-9-CM和ICD-10管理数据中合并症的编码算法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVES: Implementation of the International Statistical Classification of Disease and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision (ICD-10) coding system presents challenges for using administrative data. Recognizing this, we conducted a multistep process to develop ICD-10 coding algorithms to define Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidities in administrative data and assess the performance of the resulting algorithms. METHODS: ICD-10 coding algorithms were developed by "translation" of the ICD-9-CM codes constituting Deyo's (for Charlson comorbidities) and Elixhauser's coding algorithms and by physicians' assessment of the face-validity of selected ICD-10 codes. The process of carefully developing ICD-10 algorithms also produced modified and enhanced ICD-9-CM coding algorithms for the Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidities. We then used data on in-patients aged 18 years and older in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative hospital discharge data from a Canadian health region to assess the comorbidity frequencies and mortality prediction achieved by the original ICD-9-CM algorithms, the enhanced ICD-9-CM algorithms, and the new ICD-10 coding algorithms. RESULTS: Among 56,585 patients in the ICD-9-CM data and 58,805 patients in the ICD-10 data, frequencies of the 17 Charlson comorbidities and the 30 Elixhauser comorbidities remained generally similar across algorithms. The new ICD-10 and enhanced ICD-9-CM coding algorithms either matched or outperformed the original Deyo and Elixhauser ICD-9-CM coding algorithms in predicting in-hospital mortality. The C-statistic was 0.842 for Deyo's ICD-9-CM coding algorithm, 0.860 for the ICD-10 coding algorithm, and 0.859 for the enhanced ICD-9-CM coding algorithm, 0.868 for the original Elixhauser ICD-9-CM coding algorithm, 0.870 for the ICD-10 coding algorithm and 0.878 for the enhanced ICD-9-CM coding algorithm. CONCLUSIONS: These newly developed ICD-10 and ICD-9-CM comorbidity coding algorithms produce similar estimates of comorbidity prevalence in administrative data, and may outperform existing ICD-9-CM coding algorithms.
机译:目标:实施《疾病和相关健康问题国际统计分类》第十版(ICD-10)编码系统提出了使用行政数据的挑战。认识到这一点,我们进行了一个多步骤过程来开发ICD-10编码算法,以定义管理数据中的Charlson和Elixhauser合并症并评估所得算法的性能。方法:ICD-10编码算法是通过对构成Deyo(针对Charlson合并症)的ICD-9-CM代码和Elixhauser编码算法进行“翻译”并由医生评估所选ICD-10代码的面部有效性而开发的。精心开发ICD-10算法的过程还产生了针对Charlson和Elixhauser合并症的改进和增强的ICD-9-CM编码算法。然后,我们使用来自加拿大健康地区的ICD-9-CM和ICD-10行政医院出院数据中18岁及18岁以上住院患者的数据来评估通过原始ICD-9-CM算法实现的合并症发生率和死亡率预测,增强的ICD-9-CM算法和新的ICD-10编码算法。结果:在ICD-9-CM数据的56,585例患者和ICD-10数据的58,805例患者中,不同算法中17例Charlson合并症和30例Elixhauser合并症的发生频率大致相同。在预测住院死亡率方面,新的ICD-10和增强的ICD-9-CM编码算法与原​​始的Deyo和Elixhauser ICD-9-CM编码算法相匹配或优于。 Deyo的ICD-9-CM编码算法的C统计量为0.842,ICD-10编码算法的C统计量为0.860,增强的ICD-9-CM编码算法的C统计量为0.859,原始Elixhauser ICD-9-CM编码算法的C统计量为0.868 ,对于ICD-10编码算法为0.870,对于增强的ICD-9-CM编码算法为0.878。结论:这些新开发的ICD-10和ICD-9-CM合并症编码算法对行政数据中的合并症患病率产生相似的估计,并且可能优于现有的ICD-9-CM编码算法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号