...
首页> 外文期刊>Medical care >Community-based care and risk of nursing home placement.
【24h】

Community-based care and risk of nursing home placement.

机译:社区护理和安老院安置的风险。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To test the substitution hypothesis, that community-based care reduces the probability of institutional placement for at-risk elderly. RESEARCH DESIGN: The closure of the Social Health Maintenance Organization (Social HMO) at HealthPartners (HP) in Minnesota in 1994 and the continuation of the Social HMO at Kaiser Permanente Northwest (KPNW) in Oregon/Washington comprised a "natural experiment." Using multinomial logistic regression analyses, we followed cohorts of Social HMO enrollees for up to 5 years, 1995 to 1999. To adjust for site effects and secular trends, we also followed age- and gender-matched Medicare-Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act (TEFRA) cohorts, enrolled in the same HMOs but not in the Social HMOs. SUBJECTS: All enrollees in the Social HMO for at least 4 months in 1993 and an age-gender matched sample of Medicare-TEFRA enrollees. To be included, individuals had to be alive and have a period out of an institution after January 1, 1995 (total n = 18,143). MEASURES: Theprimary data sources were the electronic databases at HP and KPNW. The main outcomes were long-term nursing home placement (90+ days) or mortality. Covariates were age, gender, a comorbidity index, and geographic site effect. RESULTS: Adjusting for variations in the 2 sites, we found no difference in probability of mortality between the 2 cohorts, but approximately a 40% increase in long-term institutional placement associated with the termination of the Social HMO at HealthPartners (odds ratio, 1.43; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-1.79). CONCLUSIONS: The Social HMO appears to help at-risk elderly postpone long-term nursing home placement.
机译:目的:为了检验替代假说,基于社区的护理降低了高危老年人机构安置的可能性。研究设计:1994年,明尼苏达州HealthPartners(HP)的社会健康维持组织(Social HMO)的关闭以及俄勒冈州/华盛顿西北的Kaiser Permanente Northwest(KPNW)的Social HMO的继续进行都是一项“自然实验”。使用多项Logistic回归分析,我们追踪了1995年至1999年长达5年的社会HMO入组者。为了调整场所效应和长期趋势,我们还遵循了年龄和性别相匹配的《医疗保险税收公平和财政责任法》( TEFRA)队列,他们参加了相同的HMO,但没有加入社会HMO。对象:1993年,至少有4个月参加社会HMO的所有参与者,以及年龄和性别相匹配的Medicare-TEFRA参与者。要被包括在内,个人必须活着,并且必须在1995年1月1日之后离开机构(总计n = 18,143)。措施:主要数据来源是惠普和KPNW的电子数据库。主要结果是长期疗养院安置(90天以上)或死亡率。协变量是年龄,性别,合并症指数和地理位置影响。结果:调整了两个地点的差异后,我们发现两个队列之间的死亡率没有差异,但是与在HealthPartners终止社会HMO相关的长期机构位置增加了约40%(赔率,1.43) ; 95%置信区间:1.15-1.79)。结论:社会HMO似乎可以帮助处于危险中的老年人推迟长期的疗养院安置。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号