...
首页> 外文期刊>MCN: American Journal of Maternal-Child Nursing >The Efficacy of Facilitated Tucking for Relieving Procedural Pain of Endotracheal Suctioning in Very Low Birthweight Infants.
【24h】

The Efficacy of Facilitated Tucking for Relieving Procedural Pain of Endotracheal Suctioning in Very Low Birthweight Infants.

机译:出生率极低的婴儿中,便利性拔除可减轻气管内抽吸的手术疼痛。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE:: This study compared the efficacy of a behavioral pain reducing intervention (facilitated tucking) with standard neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) care for decreasing procedural pain (endotracheal suctioning) in very low birthweight (VLBW) infants. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS:: A prospective randomized crossover design with infants as their own controls were used. The sample consisted of 40 VLBW infants, 23-32 weeks gestation, and weighing 560-1498 g with tracheal intubation. The infants were observed twice during each endotracheal suctioning experience; one suctioning was done according to normal nursery routine; another was done using facilitated tucking (the caregiver "hand-swaddling" the infant by placing a hand on the infant's head and feet while providing flexion and containment). The Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) measured the infant's pain response, and severity of illness of each infant was measured by the Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology (SNAP) and the NTISS (Neonatal Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System). Repeated measures analysis of variance (RMANOVA) determined the efficacy of facilitated tucking for reducing procedural pain (PIPP) and the effects of order of intervention vs. control. Regression analyses examined the relationship of gestational age, severity of illness, and number of painful procedures to the pain response. RESULTS:: There was a significant difference between the PIPP scores for tucking and nontucking positions (p = 0.001) and a nonsignificant interaction with order (p = 0.64) as well as a nonsignificant main effect for order (p = 0.46). In the regression analyses, all predictors taken together did not significantly predict PIPP scores in the tucked position (p = 0.11) or nontucked position (p = 0.57). CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS:: Facilitated tucking is a developmentally sensitive, nonpharmacological comfort measure that can relieve procedural pain in VLBW infants. Nurses need to be increasingly aware of infant pain during daily care taking, and to use validated pain assessment instruments. Further clinical research on individual pain assessment is needed for better understanding of the quality and significance of pain for each infant, and the factors that affect pain expression.
机译:目的:这项研究比较了行为疼痛减轻干预(促成uck缩)和标准新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)护理在极低出生体重(VLBW)婴儿中减轻程序性疼痛(气管内吸痰)的功效。研究设计和方法::采用前瞻性随机交叉设计,以婴儿作为自己的对照。该样本由40名VLBW婴儿组成,妊娠23-32周,经气管插管重达560-1498 g。在每次气管内吸吮过程中,对婴儿进行了两次观察。按照正常的育儿常规进行一次吸吮;另一种方法是使用方便的褶uck(看护者通过将手放在婴儿的头和脚上,同时提供屈曲和约束力,“用手抚摸”婴儿)。早产儿疼痛概况(PIPP)测量了婴儿的疼痛反应,每个婴儿的疾病严重程度通过新生儿急性生理学评分(SNAP)和NTISS(新生儿治疗干预评分系统)进行了测量。重复测量方差分析(RMANOVA)确定了促进填塞术减轻程序性疼痛(PIPP)的效果以及干预与对照顺序的影响。回归分析检查了胎龄,疾病严重程度和痛苦手术次数与疼痛反应之间的关系。结果:褶皱位置和非褶皱位置的PIPP得分之间存在显着差异(p = 0.001),与订单之间的交互作用不显着(p = 0.64),并且订单的主要影响不显着(p = 0.46)。在回归分析中,所有的预测变量加在一起并不能显着预测折塞位置(p = 0.11)或非折塞位置(p = 0.57)的PIPP得分。临床意义:促进折皱是一种对发育敏感的,非药理学上的舒适措施,可以减轻VLBW婴儿的程序性疼痛。护士在日常护理过程中需要越来越多地意识到婴儿的疼痛,并使用经过验证的疼痛评估工具。为了更好地了解每个婴儿的疼痛质量和意义以及影响疼痛表达的因素,需要对单个疼痛进行进一步的临床研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号