首页> 外文期刊>Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers and prevention: A publication of the American Association for Cancer Research >Independent and joint effects of family history and lifestyle on colorectal cancer risk: implications for prevention.
【24h】

Independent and joint effects of family history and lifestyle on colorectal cancer risk: implications for prevention.

机译:家族史和生活方式对结直肠癌风险的独立和共同影响:对预防的意义。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

It has been suggested that, for a substantial proportion of "sporadic" colorectal cancers (CRCs), inheritance determines individual susceptibility and that lifestyle determines which susceptible individuals express cancer. Because the genetic basis of this inherited susceptibility remains undefined, we used family history of the disease as a proxy for a genetic predisposition to examine its interactions with a variety of lifestyle factors in a large population-based case-control study of CRC. The subjects were 698 male and 494 female Japanese, Caucasian, Filipino, Hawaiian, and Chinese patients diagnosed with CRC in Hawaii during 1987-1991 and 1192 population controls matched to cases on age, sex, and ethnicity. Fourteen percent of the cases and 6% of the controls reported a family history of CRC among parents or siblings. After adjusting for other covariates, significant interactions with family history were found for beef and ethanol intakes in males (P = 0.03). Relative to men without a family history and whose intake fell in the lower third, odds ratios (ORs) for CRC for men with a family history and in the upper tertile of intake were 10.8 [95% confidence interval (CI), 4.2-27.6] and 7.5 (CI, 3.1-18.2) for beef and ethanol, respectively. The corresponding ORs for men without a family history and in the upper tertile were 1.5 (CI, 1.0-2.3) and 1.4 (CI, 1.0-1.9), respectively. No interactions were detected in women. Using a summary measure of lifestyle, we found that family history was not associated with CRC among men who were at the lower-risk tertile for all of the lifestyle risk factors. In contrast, the OR for men with a family history and at the higher-risk tertile for all of the lifestyle variables was 11.7 (CI, 5.8-23.9). In the absence of a family history, this OR was 4.8 (CI, 3.2-7.2). These data suggest that family history increases the risk of sporadic CRC in men mainly through its interaction with lifestyle exposures, primarily a high beef and ethanol intake, and are consistent with recent reports of effect modifications of dietary associations by metabolic genes. Computation of population attributable risks also suggested that a comprehensive reduction in exposure to lifestyle risk factors--and more specifically to ethanol and beef for individuals with a familial predisposition for the disease--may have a large beneficial effect on CRC incidence.
机译:已经提出,对于大部分“散发性”结直肠癌(CRC),遗传决定个体的易感性,生活方式决定哪些易感个体表达癌症。由于这种遗传易感性的遗传基础仍然不确定,因此我们在大规模的基于人群的CRC病例对照研究中,使用该疾病的家族史作为遗传易感性的代表,以检查其与多种生活方式因素的相互作用。研究对象为1987年至1991年在夏威夷被诊断出患有CRC的698名男性和494名女性日本人,白种人,菲律宾人,夏威夷人和中国人,并根据年龄,性别和种族对1192名人群进行了控制。 14%的病例和6%的对照组报告父母或兄弟姐妹有CRC家族史。调整其他协变量后,男性的牛肉和乙醇摄入量与家族史之间存在显着的交互作用(P = 0.03)。相对于没有家族史且摄入量下降到三分之一的男性,有家族史和摄入量较高的男性中CRC的优势比(OR)为10.8 [95%置信区间(CI),4.2-27.6 ]和7.​​5(CI,3.1-18.2)分别用于牛肉和乙醇。没有家族史的男性和上三分位数男性的相应OR分别为1.5(CI,1.0-2.3)和1.4(CI,1.0-1.9)。在女性中未发现相互作用。通过对生活方式的总结性测量,我们发现在所有生活方式风险因素中处于较低风险三分位的男性中,家族史与CRC无关。相比之下,具有家族史并且在所有生活方式变量中处于较高风险三分位的男性的OR为11.7(CI,5.8-23.9)。在没有家族史的情况下,此OR为4.8(CI,3.2-7.2)。这些数据表明,家族史主要通过其与生活方式暴露(主要是摄入大量牛肉和乙醇)的相互作用而增加了男性散发性CRC的风险,并且与最近关于代谢基因改变饮食关联的作用的报道相一致。归因于人群的风险的计算还表明,全面降低生活方式风险因素的暴露量,尤其是对于患有该疾病的家族易感者而言,更特别地减少摄入乙醇和牛肉,可能会对CRC发生率产生巨大的有利影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号