首页> 外文期刊>Mathematical Programming >Improved approximation algorithms for two variants of the stable marriage problem with ties
【24h】

Improved approximation algorithms for two variants of the stable marriage problem with ties

机译:带联系的稳定婚姻问题的两个变体的改进的近似算法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We consider the problem of computing a large stable matching in a bipartite graph where each vertex ranks its neighbors in an order of preference, perhaps involving ties. Let the matched partner of u in a matching M be M(u). A matching M is said to be stable if there is no edge (a, b) such that a is unmatched or prefers b to M(a) and similarly, b is unmatched or prefers a to M(b). While a stable matching in G can be easily computed in linear time by the Gale-Shapley algorithm, it is known that computing a maximum size stable matching is APX-hard. In this paper we first consider the case when the preference lists of vertices in A are strict while the preference lists of vertices in B may include ties. This case is also APX-hard and the current best approximation ratio known here is 25/17 which relies on solving an LP. We improve this ratio to 22/15 by a simple linear time algorithm. Here we first compute a half-integral stable matching in and then round it to an integral stable matching M. The ratio is bounded via a payment scheme that charges other components in to cover the costs of length-5 augmenting paths. There will be no length-3 augmenting paths here. We next consider the following special case of two-sided ties, where every tie length is 2. This case is known to be UGC-hard to approximate to within 4/3. We show a 10/7 approximation algorithm here that runs in linear time.
机译:我们考虑在二部图中计算一个大型稳定匹配的问题,在该图中每个顶点将其邻居按优先顺序排列(可能涉及联系)。设匹配M中u的匹配伙伴为M(u)。如果没有边缘(a,b)使得a不匹配或比m(a)更喜欢b,并且类似地b不匹配或比a(M)更喜欢a,则认为匹配M是稳定的。尽管可以通过Gale-Shapley算法轻松地在线性时间内计算出G中的稳定匹配,但众所周知,计算最大大小的稳定匹配是APX困难的。在本文中,我们首先考虑以下情况:A中的顶点偏好列表是严格的,而B中的顶点偏好列表可能包含联系。这种情况也是APX难题,目前已知的最佳近似比是25/17,这取决于求解LP。我们通过简单的线性时间算法将该比例提高到22/15。在这里,我们首先计算的一个半积分稳定匹配,然后将其四舍五入为一个积分稳定匹配M。通过支付方案来限制该比率,该支付方案向其他组件收费以覆盖长度为5的扩展路径的成本。这里将没有长度为3的扩充路径。接下来,我们考虑以下两个双面扎带的特殊情况,其中每个扎带的长度均为2。这种情况被认为是UGC难解的,近似于4/3之内。我们在这里展示了一个以线性时间运行的10/7近似算法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号