首页> 外文期刊>Fundamental & clinical pharmacology. >A study comparing biopharmaceutic characteristics of four once daily controlled release diltiazem preparations.
【24h】

A study comparing biopharmaceutic characteristics of four once daily controlled release diltiazem preparations.

机译:一项研究比较了四种每日一次的地尔硫卓控释制剂的生物制药特性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In the present study we have compared the steady state biopharmaceutic characteristics of four diltiazem once daily controlled release capsules: Mono-Tildiem LP 300 (300 mg), Adizem XL (300 mg), Cardizem (300 mg) and Dilacor (240 mg). Sixteen healthy male volunteers (aged 22.9 +/- 3.3 years, range 19-31 years) completed an open label, multiple oral dose, randomized, four-period crossover study without a washout period in between. The volunteers received each diltiazem formulation once daily for four days. Trough diltiazem and metabolites plasma concentrations were determined on days 3 and 4. The 24-h plasma concentration-time profiles were assessed after the dose on day 4 of each period. The following steady state pharmacokinetic parameters for diltiazem were calculated: the minimum plasma concentration (cmin), the maximum plasma concentration (cmax), the time to reach that concentration (tmax), the time interval during which the plasma concentration exceeds 50% of cmax (t50), the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC72-96) and the peak-to-trough fluctuation (PTF). For the metabolites of diltiazem, N-mono-desmethyl-diltiazem (NDM) and desacetyldiltiazem (DAD), AUC72-96 (AUCNDM and AUCDAD) and the ratio metabolite/parent compound were calculated. Steady state was achieved on day 3. Except one, all controlled release formulations have satisfactory controlled release properties allowing once daily administration. However, significant (P < 0.05) differences were found between the pharmacokinetic characteristics which do not allow exchange of the various formulations. Concentrations well below 50 ng.mL-1 in the morning hours were observed for Dilacor (240 mg) and Adizem XL (300 mg), which could be a disadvantage of these formulations as it is well-known that ischaemic events occur at a higher rate during that part of the day. The plasma concentration profiles NDM and DAD, the major circulating metabolites, parallel the plasma concentration profiles for the parent compound. From a clinical point of view, all treatments were well tolerated.
机译:在本研究中,我们比较了四种地尔硫卓每日一次控释胶囊的稳态生物药物特性:Mono-Tildiem LP 300(300 mg),Adizem XL(300 mg),Cardizem(300 mg)和Dilacor(240 mg)。 16位健康的男性志愿者(年龄22.9 +/- 3.3岁,范围19-31岁)完成了开放标签,多次口服剂量,随机,四阶段交叉研究,而其间没有洗脱期。志愿者每天一次接受每种地尔硫卓制剂,持续四天。在第3天和第4天测定谷地尔硫卓和代谢产物的血浆浓度。在每个时期的第4天给药后,评估24小时血浆浓度-时间曲线。计算了地尔硫ze的以下稳态药代动力学参数:最小血浆浓度(cmin),最大血浆浓度(cmax),达到该浓度的时间(tmax),血浆浓度超过cmax的50%的时间间隔(t50),血浆浓度-时间曲线下的面积(AUC72-96)和峰谷波动(PTF)。对于地尔硫卓,N-单去甲基地尔硫卓(NDM)和去乙酰基地尔硫卓(DAD)的代谢物,计算了AUC72-96(AUCNDM和AUCDAD)以及代谢物/母体化合物的比例。在第3天达到稳态。除一次外,所有控释制剂均具有令人满意的控释特性,允许每天给药一次。然而,在药代动力学特征之间发现了显着的差异(P <0.05),这使得不能交换各种制剂。每天早上观察到Dilacor(240 mg)和Adizem XL(300 mg)的浓度远低于50 ng.mL-1,这可能是这些制剂的缺点,因为众所周知缺血事件会在较高的温度下发生在一天的这一部分中的费率。血浆浓度曲线NDM和DAD(主要的循环代谢产物)与母体化合物的血浆浓度曲线平行。从临床角度来看,所有治疗均耐受良好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号