首页> 外文期刊>Mathematical geosciences >Smooth Surface Modeling of DEMs Based on a Regularized Least Squares Method of Thin Plate Spline
【24h】

Smooth Surface Modeling of DEMs Based on a Regularized Least Squares Method of Thin Plate Spline

机译:基于薄板样条的正则最小二乘方法的DEM光滑表面建模

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Thin plate spline (TPS) has been widely accepted as a method for smooth fitting of noisy data. However, the classical TPS always has an ill-conditioning problem when two sample points are very close. Although the modified orthogonal least squares-based TPS (TPS-M) avoids this ill-conditioning problem, it is not completely immune to over-fitting when sample points are noisy. In this paper, a regularized least squares method of thin plate spline (TPS-RLS) was developed, which adds a weight penalty term to the error criterion of orthogonal least squares (OLS). TPS-RLS combines the advantages of both regularization and OLS, which avoid the over-fitting and the ill-conditioning problems simultaneously. Numerical tests indicate that irrespective of the standard deviation of sampling errors and the number of knots, TPS-RLS is always more accurate than TPS-M for smooth fitting of noisy data, whereas TPS-M would have a serious over-fitting problem if the optimal number of knots were not determined in advance. The real-world example of fitting total station instrument data shows that among the classical interpolation methods including IDW, natural neighbor and ordinary kriging, TPS-RLS has the highest accuracy for a series of DEMs with different resolutions, especially for the coarse one. Surface modeling of DEMs with contour lines demonstrate that TPS-RLS has a better performance than the classical methods in terms of both root mean squared error and relief shaded map appearance.
机译:薄板样条(TPS)已被广泛用作平滑拟合噪声数据的方法。但是,当两个采样点非常接近时,传统的TPS总是存在问题。尽管修改后的基于正交最小二乘的TPS(TPS-M)避免了这种不适情况,但当采样点嘈杂时,它并不能完全避免过度拟合。本文提出了一种薄板样条的正则化最小二乘方法(TPS-RLS),它在正交最小二乘(OLS)的误差准则中增加了权重项。 TPS-RLS结合了正则化和OLS的优点,可同时避免过度拟合和不良状况问题。数值测试表明,不管采样误差的标准偏差和节数如何,对于噪声数据的平滑拟合,TPS-RLS总是比TPS-M更为精确,而如果TPS-M会出现严重的过度拟合问题,事先没有确定最佳的结数。拟合全站仪数据的真实示例表明,在包括IDW,自然邻域和普通克里金法在内的经典插值方法中,TPS-RLS对于一系列具有不同分辨率的DEM(尤其是粗略的DEM)具有最高的精度。具有轮廓线的DEM的表面建模表明,就均方根误差和起伏阴影地图外观而言,TPS-RLS比传统方法具有更好的性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号