首页> 外文期刊>Canadian Journal of Forest Research >Development of a standardized methodology for quantifying total chlorophyll and carotenoids from foliage of hardwood and conifer tree species
【24h】

Development of a standardized methodology for quantifying total chlorophyll and carotenoids from foliage of hardwood and conifer tree species

机译:标准化方法的开发,用于量化硬木和针叶树种叶片中的总叶绿素和类胡萝卜素

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Despite the availability of several protocols for the extraction of chlorophylls and carotenoids from foliage of forest trees, information regarding their respective extraction efficiencies is scarce. We compared the efficiencies of acetone, ethanol, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), and N, N-dimethylformamide (DMF) over a range of incubation times for the extraction of chlorophylls and carotenoids using small amounts of unmacerated tissue. Of the 11 species studied, comparable amounts of chlorophyll were extracted by all four solvents from three species and by ethanol and DMF from nine species. In four species, acetone, ethanol, and DMF extracted comparable chlorophyll amounts, while in another two species comparable amounts were extracted by ethanol, DMSO, and DMF. In one species, ethanol extracted significantly greater amounts of chlorophyll compared with all other solvents. The brown coloration of DMSO extracts for some species compromised the calculations of chlorophylls and carotenoids, making DMSO a poor choice. Overall, extraction efficiencies of ethanol and DMF were comparable for analyzing chlorophyll concentrations. However, because DMF is more toxic than ethanol, we recommend ethanol as the better option of these two for chlorophyll extractions. On the other hand, DMF is the most efficient solvent among the four tested for the extraction of carotenoids from these species. The results presented will facilitate the design of multispecies local- and regional-scale ecological studies to evaluate forest health. Additionally, they will enable reliable comparisons of results from multiple laboratories and (or) studies that used different solvents and help validate chlorophyll estimates obtained by remote sensing.
机译:尽管有几种从林木叶子中提取叶绿素和类胡萝卜素的方案,但是关于它们各自的提取效率的信息却很少。我们比较了丙酮,乙醇,二甲基亚砜(DMSO)和N,N-二甲基甲酰胺(DMF)在一定孵育时间范围内使用少量未浸解组织提取叶绿素和类胡萝卜素的效率。在所研究的11个物种中,可从三种物种的所有四种溶剂以及从九种物种的乙醇和DMF中提取相当数量的叶绿素。在四个物种中,丙酮,乙醇和DMF提取了相当数量的叶绿素,而在另外两个物种中,乙醇,DMSO和DMF提取了相当数量的叶绿素。在一个物种中,与所有其他溶剂相比,乙醇提取的叶绿素量要大得多。某些物种的DMSO提取物呈棕色,这不利于叶绿素和类胡萝卜素的计算,这使DMSO成为一个糟糕的选择。总体而言,乙醇和DMF的提取效率可用于分析叶绿素浓度。但是,由于DMF比乙醇更具毒性,因此我们建议使用乙醇作为这两种方法中叶绿素提取的较好选择。另一方面,DMF是从这些物种中提取类胡萝卜素的四种测试方法中最有效的溶剂。提出的结果将有助于设计多物种的地方和区域规模的生态研究,以评估森林健康。此外,它们将使来自多个实验室和(或)使用不同溶剂的研究结果的可靠比较成为可能,并有助于验证通过遥感获得的叶绿素估计值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号