...
首页> 外文期刊>Canadian Journal of Forest Research >Bending strength and stiffness of in-grade Douglas-fir and southern pine No. 2 2 x 4 lumber
【24h】

Bending strength and stiffness of in-grade Douglas-fir and southern pine No. 2 2 x 4 lumber

机译:道格拉斯冷杉和南部松2号2 x 4木材的弯曲强度和刚度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Douglas-fir (Psuedotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco) (DF) and southern pine (Pinus spp.) (SP) trees are increasingly grown on intensively managed plantation forests that yield excellent growth. Lumber cut from these trees often contains a large percentage of juvenile wood, which negatively impacts its strength and stiffness. Design values of lumber must accurately reflect the available forest resource, and because the design values were determined over 25 years ago, questions exist whether wood quality has declined. To help address this, 1488 samples of commercial-grade No. 2 2 x 4 DF and SP lumber were destructively tested in edgewise bending. Mean stiffness of DF and SP was 11.51 and 10.89 GPa, respectively, comparing favorably with the 11.02 GPa mean design values; however, variation for SP was higher than in previous studies. The nonparametric 5th percentile bending strengths for DF and SP were 8.30 and 9.06 MPa, respectively. Both DF and SP tested at less than their design values, 9.3 and 10.34 MPa, respectively. Stiffness explained 66% and 52%, respectively, of the variability in strength for DF and SP. Because this relationship seems only moderately predictive, it may be prudent to couple stiffness with additional measures of quality when predicting bending strength.
机译:道格拉斯冷杉(Psuedotsuga menziesii(Mirb。)佛朗哥)(DF)和南部松树(Pinus spp。)(SP)的树木越来越多地种植在集约经营的人工林上,这些林木生长迅速。从这些树木砍伐的木材通常含有大量的幼木,这对其强度和刚度产生了负面影响。木材的设计值必须准确反映可用的森林资源,并且由于设计值是在25年前确定的,因此存在木材质量是否下降的问题。为了解决这个问题,对1488块商品级2 2 x 4 DF和SP木材进行了横向弯曲破坏性测试。 DF和SP的平均刚度分别为11.51 GPa和10.89 GPa,与11.02 GPa的平均设计值相比具有优势。但是,SP的变化高于以前的研究。 DF和SP的非参数第五百分位弯曲强度分别为8.30和9.06 MPa。 DF和SP的测试值分别低于其设计值9.3和10.34 MPa。刚度分别解释了DF和SP强度变化的66%和52%。由于这种关系似乎只是适度的预测,因此在预测弯曲强度时,应将刚度与附加质量度量结合起来是谨慎的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号