...
首页> 外文期刊>Canadian journal of anesthesia: Journal canadien d'anesthesie >New supraglottic airway with built-in pressure indicator decreases postoperative pharyngolaryngeal symptoms: A randomized controlled trial
【24h】

New supraglottic airway with built-in pressure indicator decreases postoperative pharyngolaryngeal symptoms: A randomized controlled trial

机译:内置压力指示器的新声门上气道减少了术后咽喉咽部症状:一项随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose: Excessive supraglottic airway cuff pressure increases postoperative pharyngolaryngeal symptoms such as sore throat, dysphonia, and dysphagia. A new supraglottic airway, AES Ultra CPV? (CPV), has a built-in intracuff pressure indicator. We hypothesized that using the CPV would reduce postoperative symptoms when compared with the LMA Classic? (LMA) without intracuff pressure guidance. Methods: Ambulatory patients undergoing general anesthesia were randomized to either CPV or LMA. A size 3/4/5 was inserted according to manufacturer guidelines. Nitrous oxide was not used. In the LMA Group, the cuff was inflated according to manufacturer's guidelines. In the CPV Group, a CPV was inserted and the cuff inflated until the indicator was in the green zone (30-44 mmHg). Intracuff pressures were measured at five minutes and 20 min post-insertion in both groups. The primary outcome was the incidence of pharyngolaryngeal symptoms, defined as sore throat, dysphonia, and/or dysphagia at one, two, and/or 24 hr postoperatively. Continuous data were compared using Student's t test and categorical data were analyzed using Chi square analysis. Results: The study included 170 patients, 85 per group. The mean (SD) intracuff pressure in the CPV group was significantly lower [44 (4) mmHg] than in the LMA Group [87 (37) mmHg]; P < 0.001. The incidence of pharyngolaryngeal symptoms was significantly lower in the CPV Group than in the LMA Group (26% vs 49%; P = 0.002). The absolute risk reduction was 24%, and the number-needed-to-treat was 4.3. Conclusion: The incidence of postoperative pharyngolaryngeal symptoms in the CPV Group with a cuff pressure-guided strategy was significantly lower than in the LMA Group with standard practice. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT01800344).
机译:目的:声门上气道袖带压力过高会增加术后咽咽喉部症状,例如喉咙痛,发声困难和吞咽困难。新型声门上呼吸道AES Ultra CPV? (CPV),具有内置的袖带内压力指示器。我们假设与LMA Classic相比,使用CPV可以减少术后症状? (LMA)无袖带内压力引导。方法:将全麻门诊患者随机分为CPV或LMA。根据制造商指南插入了3/4/5尺寸。不使用一氧化二氮。在LMA集团中,根据制造商的指南对袖带充气。在CPV组中,插入CPV并给袖带充气,直到指示器处于绿色区域(30-44 mmHg)。两组均在插入后5分钟和20分钟测量袖带内压力。主要结果是咽喉症状的发生率,定义为术后一,二和/或二十四小时出现喉咙痛,声音障碍和/或吞咽困难。使用Student's t检验比较连续数据,并使用卡方分析分析分类数据。结果:该研究包括170名患者,每组85名。 CPV组的平均袖带内压力[44(4)mmHg]明显低于LMA组[87(37)mmHg]; P <0.001。 CPV组的咽喉症状发生率显着低于LMA组(26%比49%; P = 0.002)。绝对风险降低为24%,需要治疗的人数为4.3。结论:采用袖带压引导策略的CPV组术后咽咽喉部症状的发生率显着低于标准做法的LMA组。 (临床试验注册号:NCT01800344)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号