...
首页> 外文期刊>Canadian journal of anesthesia: Journal canadien d'anesthesie >The Microcuff tube allows a longer time interval until unsafe cuff pressures are reached in children.
【24h】

The Microcuff tube allows a longer time interval until unsafe cuff pressures are reached in children.

机译:Microcuff管允许更长的时间间隔,直到儿童达到不安全的袖带压力为止。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

PURPOSE: To compare cuff pressures during nitrous oxide exposure in the new Microcuff pediatric tracheal tube (MPT) with ultrathin high volume - low pressure polyurethane cuff to a tube with a standard polyvinyl chloride (PVC) cuff. METHODS: With approval of the local Ethics Committee, 30 pediatric patients requiring tracheal intubation [tube size internal diameter (ID) 4.0 mm, or ID 7.0 mm) were included. Patients were randomly divided in three groups: A) MPT, baseline cuff pressure 20 cm H(2)O; B) PVC, baseline cuff pressure 20 cm H(2)O; and C) MPT, baseline cuff pressure set to sealing pressure. Anesthesia technique and ventilator settings were standardized. The time required for cuff pressure to increase to 25 cm H(2)O was recorded and pressure reduced to baseline. The number of gas removals required during the first hour was noted. Data are median (range). Groups were compared by the Kruskal-Wallis test (P < 0.05). RESULTS: There were no differences between groups in patient characteristics. PVC and MPT cuffs inflated to a baseline pressure of 20 cm H(2)O were similar regarding the time to first removal of gas [A: nine minutes (4-24), B: eight minutes (4-46)], and number of removals required [A: four (2-6), B: three (1-5)]. In MPT with baseline pressure set to sealing pressure [10 cm H(2)O (8-14)] time to first gas removal and number of removals were significantly less (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: When baseline inflation pressure was set at 20 cm H(2)O, cuff pressure increased similarly in MPT and PVC tubes. When inflated just to sealing pressure, the MPT allowed a longer time interval until the upper limit of 25 cm H(2)O was reached.
机译:目的:比较带有超薄高容量低压聚氨酯袖带的新型Microcuff儿科气管导管(MPT)与装有标准聚氯乙烯(PVC)袖带的导管之间的一氧化二氮暴露过程中的袖带压力。方法:经当地伦理委员会批准,纳入30例需要气管插管的小儿患者(管径内径(ID)4.0毫米,或ID 7.0毫米)。将患者随机分为三组:A)MPT,基线袖带压20 cm H(2)O; B)PVC,基线袖带压力20 cm H(2)O; C)MPT,将基准袖带压力设定为密封压力。麻醉技术和呼吸机设置标准化。记录袖带压力增加至25 cm H(2)O所需的时间,压力降至基线。记录了第一个小时所需的除气次数。数据是中位数(范围)。通过Kruskal-Wallis检验比较各组(P <0.05)。结果:两组患者的特征无差异。充气至基线压力为20 cm H(2)O的PVC和MPT袖带在首次去除气体的时间方面相似[A:九分钟(4-24),B:八分钟(4-46)],并且所需清除次数[A:四(2-6),B:三(1-5)]。在将基准压力设置为密封压力[10 cm H(2)O(8-14)]的MPT中,首次去除气体的时间和去除次数显着减少(P <0.05)。结论:当基线充气压力设定为20 cm H(2)O时,MPT和PVC管中的袖带压力同样增加。当仅充气至密封压力时,MPT允许更长的时间间隔,直到达到25 cm H(2)O的上限。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号