...
首页> 外文期刊>Canadian journal of anesthesia: Journal canadien d'anesthesie >The effect of epidural needle type on postdural puncture headache: a randomized trial.
【24h】

The effect of epidural needle type on postdural puncture headache: a randomized trial.

机译:硬膜外针型对硬膜外穿刺性头痛的影响:一项随机试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE: A prospective, randomized trial in labouring parturients was undertaken to assess whether the 18G Special Sprotte epidural needle is associated with a lower incidence of accidental dural puncture (ADP) in comparison with the 17G Tuohy needle. A secondary purpose was to determine if the incidence of postdural puncture headache (PDPH ) differed between groups when ADP occurred. METHODS: Following Institutional Review Board approval 1,077 parturients requesting epidural analgesia at three tertiary obstetrical units were randomized to epidural catheter insertion with a 17G Tuohy or 18G Special Sprotte needle. Patients were followed for seven days by a blinded assessor to determine the occurrence of PDPH using standardized criteria. If postural headache or neck ache presented, an ADP was diagnosed even if cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was not observed at insertion. This subgroup was followed daily to assess headache characteristics and response to blood patch. RESULTS: Six Tuohy group patients, and twopatients in the Sprotte group were excluded. One of the six excluded in the Tuohy group had an ADP. Twenty-eight ADPs occurred, nine unrecognized by CSF visualization (1.8% Tuohy, 3.4% Sprotte, P = 0.12). The incidence of unrecognized ADPs was higher in the Sprotte group (40% Sprotte vs 20% Tuohy, P < 0.05). If ADP occurred, the incidence of PDPH was lower in the Sprotte group (100% Tuohy vs 55% Sprotte, P = 0.025). The ease of use, and user satisfaction were higher in the Tuohy group (84 +/- 17.3% Tuohy vs 68.2 +/- 25.3% Sprotte, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The incidence of ADP was not reduced with the Special Sprotte epidural needle in comparison with the Tuohy needle, but PDPH after ADP occurred less frequently in the Sprotte group.
机译:目的:进行一项前瞻性随机产妇试验,以评估18G特殊Sprotte硬膜外针头与17G Tuohy针头相比是否具有较低的意外硬膜穿刺(ADP)发生率。第二个目的是确定当发生ADP时两组之间的硬脑膜穿刺后头痛(PDPH)的发生率是否不同。方法:经过机构审查委员会的批准,将三个产科三个产科单位要求硬膜外镇痛的1,077名产妇随机分配到17G Tuohy或18G Special Sprotte针硬膜外导管插入。盲人评估者将患者随访7天,以使用标准化标准确定PDPH的发生。如果出现姿势性头痛或颈部疼痛,即使在插入时未观察到脑脊液(CSF),也可诊断为ADP。每天跟踪该亚组以评估头痛特征和对血液斑的反应。结果:排除了Tuohy组的6例患者和Sprotte组的2例患者。在Tuohy组中被排除的六个人中有一个具有ADP。发生了28个ADP,其中9个未被CSF可视化识别(1.8%的Tuohy,3.4%的Sprotte,P = 0.12)。在Sprotte组中,未被识别的ADP发生率更高(40%Sprotte对20%Tuohy,P <0.05)。如果发生ADP,则Sprotte组中PDPH的发生率较低(100%Tuohy对55%Sprotte,P = 0.025)。在Tuohy组中,易用性和用户满意度较高(Tuohy组为84 +/- 17.3%,Sprotte组为68.2 +/- 25.3%,P <0.001)。结论:与Tuohy针相比,特殊Sprotte硬膜外穿刺针未降低ADP的发生率,但在Sprotte组中,ADP后PDPH的发生频率较低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号