...
【24h】

Reply

机译:回复

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We thank Drs. Lange, Roewer and Kehl for expressing interest in our recent paper, using our findings that beta Mockers were unequally distributed between groups in our recent meta-analysis to highlight their recent investigations which suggest a, negative interaction between beta blockers and ischemic preconditioning in vivo? Their findings are both interesting and intrigu-ingy and come at a time when the efficacy of periopera-tive beta blockade has become increasingly controversial. The evidence cited refers to beta blockade in non-cardiac investigations, an important distinction since our report was limited to cardiac surgery. Coronary artery surgery has definitive periods of ischemia and reperfusion, a situation which is infrequent and unpredictable in non-cardiac surgery. Secondly, we emphasize, that unlike beta blockade, there is no clinical evidence of an ischemic preconditioning like the effect of inhaled anesthetics in non-cardiac surgery.
机译:我们感谢博士。 Lange,Roewer和Kehl在我们的近期荟萃分析中使用了我们的发现,即βMockers在各组之间的分布不均,以强调他们最近的研究表明β受体阻滞剂与体内缺血预处理之间存在负作用吗?他们的发现既有趣又有趣,是在围手术期β受体阻滞剂的疗效日益引起争议的时候。引用的证据涉及非心脏检查中的β受体阻滞剂,这是一个重要的区别,因为我们的报告仅限于心脏外科手术。冠状动脉手术具有确定的局部缺血和再灌注期,这种情况在非心脏手术中很少见且无法预测。其次,我们强调,与β受体阻滞剂不同,没有像缺血性预处理那样的临床证据,如非心脏手术中吸入麻醉药的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号