首页> 外文期刊>Functional Ecology >Are all eggs created equal? Food availability and the fitness trade-off between reproduction and immunity
【24h】

Are all eggs created equal? Food availability and the fitness trade-off between reproduction and immunity

机译:所有蛋都相等吗?粮食供应和生殖与免疫之间的权衡取舍

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Reproduction and immune function are critical processes, but organisms can rarely optimize both traits. Resultant reproductionimmunity trade-offs may be facultative', occurring only when resources are scarce, or they may be obligate', occurring regardless of resource availability. Previous research has tested for the facultative' or obligate' nature of reproductionimmunity trade-offs by measuring resource allocation (e.g. follicle size). However, measuring resource allocation alone may be insufficient when gauging the fitness consequences of reproductionimmunity trade-offs because the number and quality of eggs or offspring trade off with one another. We used the Texas field cricket (Gryllus texensis) to provide the most direct test to date of whether a fitness trade-off between these two traits is facultative' or obligate'. We used a factorial design to manipulate food availability and immune status throughout adulthood. We then estimated lifetime fecundity, hatching success and their product (reproductive success), and we also measured several aspects of offspring quality (e.g. egg size and protein content, and hatchling size and energy stores). A reproductionimmunity trade-off was obligate' in this species because immune challenge reduced reproductive success estimates regardless of food availability. Females with unlimited food were more fecund and produced more and larger hatchlings, but neither food availability nor immune status affected egg size, egg phenoloxidase activity, incubation duration, hatching success or hatchling energy stores. We observed a trade-off between offspring size and number females favouring offspring size over fecundity produced fewer hatchlings, but their hatchlings were of higher quality (larger and more robust). By demonstrating that not all eggs are created equal, we provide key insight into the role of reproductive allocation in the fitness trade-off between reproduction and immunity.
机译:繁殖和免疫功能是关键过程,但是生物很少能同时优化这两个性状。产生的生殖免疫权衡可能是兼职的,仅在资源稀缺时发生,或者它们可能是强制性的,而与资源的可获得性无关。以前的研究已经通过测量资源分配(例如卵泡大小)来测试生殖免疫权衡的兼性或专性。但是,在衡量生殖免疫权衡的适用性后果时,仅靠衡量资源分配可能是不够的,因为鸡蛋或后代的数量和质量会相互取舍。迄今为止,我们使用德克萨斯州田(Gryllus texensis)来提供最直接的测试,以检验这两个性状之间的适应性折衷是兼性的还是专性的。我们使用析因设计来控制整个成年期的食物供应和免疫状况。然后我们估算了一生的繁殖力,孵化成功率及其产品(繁殖成功率),并且还测量了后代质量的几个方面(例如卵大小和蛋白质含量以及孵化大小和能量存储)。在这种物种中,必须进行生殖免疫权衡,因为无论食物供应如何,免疫挑战都会降低生殖成功的估计。没有食物限制的雌性繁殖力更高,并产生更多和更大的孵化场,但是食物供应量和免疫状态都不会影响卵的大小,卵中的酚氧化酶活性,孵化时间,孵化成功率或孵化储能能力。我们观察到后代大小与赞成后代大小而不是繁殖力的雌性数量之间的权衡会产生较少的孵化,但是它们的孵化质量较高(更大且更结实)。通过证明并非所有卵子都是一样的,我们对生殖分配在生殖与免疫之间的权衡取舍中的作用提供了重要的见识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号