首页> 外文期刊>Food Manufacturing >What's Next? The Case For (and Against) Irradiation technology
【24h】

What's Next? The Case For (and Against) Irradiation technology

机译:下一步是什么?支持和反对辐照技术

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

It can prevent food-borne illness and death; and, perhaps, radically alter the food processing Industry. But a jittery public, some bad press and nagging questions create a few bumps for the business of irradiation. The U. S. Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in Atlanta estimates that each year 5,200 people die from food-related illnesses. Another 323,000 people are hospitalized. And a staggering 76 million others become ill from bacteria-contaminated food. The economic toll of food borne illness is excruciatingly high. According to its calculations, the CDC says food-borne illnesses cost USD6.7 billion annually in lost work and hospitalizations. It's a hefty price tag and, according to some, an unnecessary expense in terms of economic and human toll.
机译:它可以预防食源性疾病和死亡;也许从根本上改变了食品加工业。但是公众不安,一些不好的新闻和na的问题给辐照业务带来了一些障碍。位于亚特兰大的美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)估计,每年有5200人死于与食物有关的疾病。另有323,000人住院。另有7600万其他人因受细菌污染的食物而生病。食源性疾病造成的经济损失非常高。根据疾病预防控制中心的计算,食源性疾病每年使失去工作和住院的费用达到67亿美元。这是一个高昂的价格标签,并且根据某些人的说法,这在经济和人员伤亡方面是不必要的支出。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号