...
首页> 外文期刊>Canadian journal of anesthesia: Journal canadien d'anesthesie >Best evidence in critical care medicine: central venous catheterization: the impact of insertion site.
【24h】

Best evidence in critical care medicine: central venous catheterization: the impact of insertion site.

机译:重症监护医学的最佳证据:中央静脉导管插入术:插入部位的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Central venous catheterization is a common procedure in critical care medicine and anesthesia. Infection impacts patient outcome and, depending on definition, complicates 5-19% of central venous catheter (CVC) insertions. One of the factors hypothesized to affect infection rates is the site of venous cannulation.Design: A three-year prospective observational study comparing the site of non-antimicrobial impregnated venous catheter insertion, and incidence of both catheter related local infections (CRLI) and catheter related blood stream infections (CRBSI). CRLI was defined as any sign of local infection, induration, erythema, heat, pain or purulent drainage, as well as catheter tip colonization. Catheter related blood stream infections were defined as positive peripheral blood culture, catheter tip colonization with the same organism, and signs of systemic infection with no other apparent source.Patients: All patients admitted to a 24 bed intensive care unit during the three-year study period.Intervention: NonePrimary endpoint: The incidence of catheter tip infections (> 15 colony forming units on catheter tip), CRLI and CRBSI.Results: There were 2,595 CVCs in 2,018 patients, for a total of 18,999 catheter days. Catheter insertions were as follows: 917 subclavian CVCs (8,239 total days), 1,390 jugular CVCs (8,361 days) and 288 femoral CVCs (2,399 days). The incidence density (number of infections per 1,000 catheter days) of CRLI for each site was subclavian 1.57, jugular 7.65, and femoral 15.83 (mean 6.05). The incidence of CRBSI for each site was: subclavian 0.97, jugular2.99, and femoral 8.34 (mean 2.79). The femoral site had a significantly higher incidence density of CRLI and CRBSI than either the internal jugular or subclavian. The jugular site had a significantly higher incidence than the subclavian.Conclusion: To minimize the risk of CVC related infection, the preferred order of insertion, for non-antimicrobial impregnated catheters, should be subclavian first, followed by jugular and then femoral.
机译:背景:中心静脉导管插入术是重症监护医学和麻醉中的常见程序。感染会影响患者的预后,并且取决于定义,会使中心静脉导管(CVC)插入的5-19%复杂化。假设会影响感染率的因素之一是静脉插管部位。设计:一项为期三年的前瞻性观察性研究,比较了非抗菌剂浸渍的静脉导管插入部位,导管相关局部感染(CRLI)和导管的发生率相关的血流感染(CRBSI)。 CRLI被定义为任何局部感染,硬结,红斑,热,疼痛或脓性引流以及导管尖端定植的迹象。导管相关的血流感染被定义为外周血培养阳性,同一生物体的导管尖端定植,以及没有其他明显来源的全身感染的迹象。患者:在三年研究中,所有患者均入院了24床重症监护室干预措施:无主要终点:导管尖端感染(导管尖端上有超过15个菌落形成单位),CRLI和CRBSI的发生率。结果:2,018例患者中有2,595例CVC,总共18,999导管天。导管插入如下:917例锁骨下CVC(共8239天),1390例颈内CVC(8361天)和288例股静脉CVC(2399天)。每个部位CRLI的发生密度(每1,000个导管日的感染数)为锁骨下1.57,颈7.65和股骨15.83(平均6.05)。每个部位CRBSI的发生率分别为:锁骨下0.97,颈静脉2.99和股骨8.34(平均2.79)。股骨部位的CRLI和CRBSI的发生密度明显高于颈内或锁骨下。结论:为了最大程度地降低CVC相关感染的风险,对于非抗微生物浸渍导管,插入的首选顺序应首先是锁骨下,然后是颈后,然后是股骨。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号