首页> 外文期刊>Gastroenterology >Equal efficacy of endoscopic variceal ligation and propranolol in preventing variceal bleeding in patients with noncirrhotic portal hypertension.
【24h】

Equal efficacy of endoscopic variceal ligation and propranolol in preventing variceal bleeding in patients with noncirrhotic portal hypertension.

机译:内镜下静脉曲张结扎术和普萘洛尔在预防非肝硬化门脉高压症患者曲张静脉出血中的疗效相同。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Variceal bleeding increases morbidity and mortality among patients with noncirrhotic portal hypertension (NCPH). Blockers of beta-adrenergic receptor signaling and endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) have been used to prevent recurrence of bleeding, based on data from cirrhotic patients. We compared the efficacy and safety of the beta-blocker propranolol with that of EVL in preventing the recurrence of variceal bleeding in patients with NCPH. METHODS: Consecutive patients with NCPH with a history of variceal bleeding in the past 6 weeks were assigned randomly to groups treated every 3 weeks with EVL (n = 51) or propranolol (until they had a resting heart rate of 55 beats per minute or to a maximum of 320 mg/day; n = 50). Primary end points were recurrence of variceal bleeding or death. Secondary end points were complications of EVL in patients given EVL, variceal eradication after EVL, variceal recurrence after EVL, or a decrease in variceal grade in patients given propranolol. RESULTS: After a median follow-up period of 23 months, rates of recurrence of bleeding were similar between the groups (EVL, 23.5%; propranolol, 18%; P = .625). The actuarial probability of remaining free of bleeding recurrence was similar between the groups. No deaths occurred in either group. Of the patients given propranolol, 47% had a decrease in the grade of varices and none experienced bleeding. Adverse events were minor and comparable between groups (EVL, 12%; propranolol, 18%; P = .635). CONCLUSIONS: EVL was not more effective than the beta-blocker propranolol for the secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in patients with NCPH.
机译:背景与目的:静脉曲张破裂出血会增加非肝硬化门脉高压症(NCPH)患者的发病率和死亡率。根据肝硬化患者的数据,β-肾上腺素受体信号传导阻滞剂和内镜下静脉曲张结扎术(EVL)已被用于预防出血复发。我们比较了β受体阻断剂普萘洛尔和EVL预防NCPH患者静脉曲张破裂出血的疗效和安全性。方法:将连续6个月内有曲张静脉出血史的NCPH连续患者随机分为每3周一次接受EVL(n = 51)或普萘洛尔治疗的组(直到他们的静息心率每分钟55次或最多320毫克/天; n = 50)。主要终点是静脉曲张破裂出血或死亡的复发。次要终点是接受EVL的患者的EVL并发症,接受EVL后的静脉曲张根除,接受EVL后的静脉曲张复发或接受普萘洛尔的患者静脉曲张分级降低。结果:在平均随访23个月后,两组之间的出血复发率相似(EVL为23.5%;普萘洛尔为18%; P = .625)。两组之间保持无出血复发的精算概率相似。两组均未发生死亡。在接受普萘洛尔治疗的患者中,有47%的患者的静脉曲张分级降低了,没有出血。两组之间的不良事件较小且可比较(EVL,12%;普萘洛尔,18%; P = .635)。结论:对于继发性预防NCPH患者的静脉曲张破裂出血,EVL不比β受体阻滞剂普萘洛尔有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号