首页> 外文期刊>Gastroenterology >Effectiveness of Sofosbuvir, Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir, or Paritaprevir/Ritonavir/Ombitasvir and Dasabuvir Regimens for Treatment of Patients With Hepatitis C in the Veterans Affairs National Health Care System
【24h】

Effectiveness of Sofosbuvir, Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir, or Paritaprevir/Ritonavir/Ombitasvir and Dasabuvir Regimens for Treatment of Patients With Hepatitis C in the Veterans Affairs National Health Care System

机译:Sofosbuvir,Ledipasvir / Sofosbuvir或Paritaprevir / Ritonavir / Ombitasvir和Dasabuvir方案在退伍军人事务国家卫生保健系统中治疗丙型肝炎患者的有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We investigated the real-world effectiveness of sofosbuvir, ledipasvir/sofosbuvir, and paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombitasvir and dasabuvir (PrOD) in treatment of different subgroups of patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes 1, 2, 3, or 4. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of data from 17,487 patients with HCV infection (13,974 with HCV genotype 1; 2131 with genotype 2; 1237 with genotype 3; and 135 with genotype 4) who began treatment with sofosbuvir (n = 2986), ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (n = 11,327), or PrOD (n = 3174), with or without ribavirin, from January 1, 2014 through June 20, 2015 in the Veterans Affairs health care system. Data through April 15, 2016 were analyzed to assess completion of treatments and sustained virologic response 12 weeks after treatment (SVR12). Mean age of patients was 61 = 7 years, 97% were male, 52% were non-Hispanic white, 29% were non-Hispanic black, 32% had a diagnosis of cirrhosis (9.9% with decompensated cirrhosis), 36% had a Fibrosis-4 index score >3.25 (indicator of cirrhosis), and 29% had received prior antiviral treatment. RESULTS: An SVR12 was achieved by 92.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 92.3%-93.2%) of subjects with HCV genotype 1 infection (no significant difference between ledipasvir/sofosbuvir and PrOD regimens), 86.2% (95% CI, 84.6%-87.7%) of those with genotype 2 infection (treated with sofosbuvir and ribavirin), 74.8% (95% CI, 72.2%-77.3%) of those with genotype 3 infection (77.9% in patients given ledipasvir/sofosbuvir plus ribavirin, 87.0% in patients given sofosbuvir and pegylated-interferon plus ribavirin, and 70.6% of patients given sofosbuvir plus ribavirin), and 89.6% (95% CI 82.8%-93.9%) of those with genotype 4 infection. Among patients with cirrhosis, 90.6% of patients with HCV genotype 1, 77.3% with HCV genotype 2, 65.7% with HCV genotype 3, and 83.9% with HCV genotype 4 achieved an SVR12. Among previously treated patients, 92.6% with genotype 1; 80.2% with genotype 2; 69.2% with genotype 3; and 93.5% with genotype 4 achieved SVR12. Among treatment-naive patients, 92.8% with genotype 1; 88.0% with genotype 2; 77.5% with genotype 3; and 88.3% with genotype 4 achieved SVR12. Eight-week regimens of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir produced an SVR12 in 94.3% of eligible patients with HCV genotype 1 infection; this regimen was underused. CONCLUSIONS: High proportions of patients with HCV infections genotypes 1-4 (ranging from 75% to 93%) in the Veterans Affairs national health care system achieved SVR12, approaching the results reported in clinical trials, especially in patients with genotype 1 infection. An 8-week regimen of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir is effective for eligible patients with HCV genotype 1 infection and could reduce costs. There is substantial room for improvement in SVRs among persons with cirrhosis and genotype 2 or 3 infections.
机译:背景与目的:我们研究了索非布韦,ledipasvir /索非布韦,paritaprevir / ritonavir / ombitasvir和dasabuvir(PrOD)在治疗亚型丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)基因型1、2、3的不同亚组中的实际疗效。 ,或4种。方法:我们对开始使用sofosbuvir(n = 1)的17487例HCV感染患者的数据进行了回顾性分析(13974例HCV基因型1; 2131例基因2型; 1237例基因3型; 135例基因4型)。 (2986),ledipasvir / sofosbuvir(n = 11,327)或PrOD(n = 3174),有或没有利巴韦林,从2014年1月1日至2015年6月20日在退伍军人事务卫生保健系统中进行。分析截至2016年4月15日的数据,以评估治疗完成和治疗后12周的持续病毒学应答(SVR12)。患者的平均年龄为61岁= 7岁,男性为97%,非西班牙裔白人为52%,非西班牙裔黑人为29%,诊断为肝硬化(有失代偿性肝硬化为9.9%),有36%患有肝硬化。 Fibrosis-4指数得分> 3.25(肝硬化指标),并且29%的患者曾接受过抗病毒治疗。结果:SVR12分别达到HCV基因型1感染受试者的92.8%(95%置信区间[CI],92.3%-93.2%)(ledipasvir / sofosbuvir和PrOD方案之间无显着差异),86.2%(95%CI)基因型2感染者(用sofosbuvir和利巴韦林治疗)占84.6%-87.7%,基因型3感染者74.8%(95%CI,72.2%-77.3%)(接受ledipasvir / sofosbuvir plus联合治疗的患者为77.9%)利巴韦林,接受索非布韦和聚乙二醇干扰素加利巴韦林治疗的患者为87.0%,接受索非布韦加利巴韦林治疗的患者为70.6%,基因型4感染者为89.6%(95%CI 82.8%-93.9%)。在肝硬化患者中,90%的HCV基因型1的患者中,有77.3%的HCV基因型2的患者,65.7%的HCV基因型3和83.9%的HCV基因型4的患者达到了SVR12。在先前接受过治疗的患者中,基因型1为92.6%;基因型2为80.2%;基因型3为69.2%;基因型4的93.5%达到了SVR12。在未接受治疗的患者中,基因型1的患者占92.8%;在基因型1的患者中占92.8%。基因型2为88.0%;基因型3为77.5%;基因型4的88.3%达到了SVR12。 ledipasvir / sofosbuvir的八周方案在94.3%的HCV基因型1感染的合格患者中产生了SVR12。该方案未得到充分利用。结论:退伍军人事务国家卫生保健系统中有1-4例HCV感染基因型1-4的患者(从75%到93%)达到SVR12,接近临床试验中报告的结果,尤其是对于1型基因感染的患者。 ledipasvir / sofosbuvir的8周疗程对合格的HCV基因型1型感染患者有效,并可降低费用。在肝硬化和基因型2或3型感染者中,SVR有很大的改善空间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号