...
首页> 外文期刊>Canadian journal of anesthesia: Journal canadien d'anesthesie >Dissociation between haemodynamics and sympathetic activation during anaesthetic induction with desfluranes.
【24h】

Dissociation between haemodynamics and sympathetic activation during anaesthetic induction with desfluranes.

机译:地氟醚麻醉诱导过程中血流动力学和交感神经活化之间的分离。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE: To compare the simultaneous haemodynamic effects, sympathetic activation and cardiac risks associated with desflurane used in a balanced technique, with those of isoflurane anaesthesia. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, open label study was conducted at a University medical centre. Forty patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery were randomized to receive either desflurane or isoflurane as the primary anaesthetic agent. After premedication, fentanyl and thiopentone were administered i.v.. Anaesthesia was increased up to 1.0 MACET in O2 via controlled mask ventilation and maintained at 1.0 MAC before tracheal intubation. Maintenance consisted of N2O, O2 and desflurane or isoflurane for 10 min. During the study, HR and arterial BP were continuously measured, as were ECG ST-segments and ventricular dysrhythmias using a 3-channel Holter ECG recorder. Left ventricular global and regional function were measured using precordial echocardiography. Serial plasma catecholamine concentrations were measured. RESULTS: For both groups, HR was maintained without increases over baseline values while systolic BP showed a progressive decrease during induction. Use of beta blockade during induction was higher in the desflurane (7/20 = 35%) than in the isoflurane group (1/20 = 5%), P = 0.04. The plasma norepinephrine concentrations progressively increased in the desflurane group but not in the isoflurane group. Four patients in the desflurane and three in the isoflurane group developed transient worsening of regional function but no change in mean left ventricular ejection fraction area and no ECG ischaemia occurred during anaesthetic induction. CONCLUSIONS: Desflurane differs from isoflurane in that sympathetic stimulation persisted despite blunting of potential hyperdynamic haemodynamic responses by narcotic and beta blockade. However, this sympathetic activation did not appear to increase cardiac risks.
机译:目的:比较异氟烷麻醉与平衡法中使用的地氟醚同时对血流动力学的影响,交感神经激活和心脏风险。方法:在大学医学中心进行了一项前瞻性,随机,开放标签研究。 40名接受非心脏大手术的患者被随机分配接受地氟醚或异氟烷作为主要麻醉剂。预防性用药后,静脉注射芬太尼和硫代戊酮。通过气管插管通气将麻醉药中O2的麻醉浓度提高至1.0 MACET,并在气管插管前维持在1.0 MAC。维护包括N2O,O2和地氟醚或异氟烷10分钟。在研究过程中,使用3通道动态心电图记录仪连续测量心率和动脉血压,以及心电图ST段和心律不齐。使用心前区超声心动图测量左心室整体和区域功能。测量血浆血浆儿茶酚胺浓度。结果:两组患者的HR均维持在基线水平以上,而收缩压在诱导期间逐渐降低。地氟醚中诱导使用β受体阻滞剂(7/20 = 35%)高于异氟烷组(1/20 = 5%),P = 0.04。地氟醚组的血浆去甲肾上腺素浓度逐渐升高,而异氟烷组则未升高。地氟醚中的4例患者和异氟烷组中的3例患者出现局部功能的暂时性恶化,但在麻醉诱导期间平均左心室射血分数面积没有变化,并且没有发生心电图缺血。结论:地氟醚与异氟烷的不同之处在于,尽管麻醉和β受体阻滞使潜在的高动力血流动力学反应减弱,但交感神经刺激仍然持续。但是,这种交感神经激活似乎并未增加心脏病的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号