...
首页> 外文期刊>Foster Natural Gas Report >American Gas Association Calculates Relative Benefit of Natural Gas to Consumers after Accounting for Measurements on a Full-Fuel-Cycle Basis
【24h】

American Gas Association Calculates Relative Benefit of Natural Gas to Consumers after Accounting for Measurements on a Full-Fuel-Cycle Basis

机译:在考虑了全燃料循环基础上的测量结果之后,美国天然气协会计算了天然气对消费者的相对利益

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In a 10/20/09 publication, the American Gas Association (AGA) advocates a full-fuel-cycle evaluation approach by government to measure energy efficiency, economics and the environment. Natural gas, electricity, oil, and propane compete in the residential sector especially for space heating and water heating, cooking, and clothes-drying applications. AGA's findings assert that use of natural gas rather than electricity, oil, or propane in residential applications, when evaluated on a full-fuel-cycle basis, results in significant reductions in energy production, consumer energy bills, and air pollutant emissions. "It is important that government policies and regulations that influence energy matters be based on accurate measurements of energy efficiency and environmental impacts," the gas group declared. Most policies and regulations that influence energy matters today are site-based and only consider the impacts at the site where the energy is ultimately consumed. These kinds of regulations, such as appliance efficiency standards and measurement, can lead to higher energy resource consumption as well as higher levels of pollution, AGA warned.
机译:在2009年10月20日的出版物中,美国天然气协会(AGA)倡导政府采用全燃料循环评估方法来衡量能源效率,经济和环境。天然气,电力,石油和丙烷在住宅领域竞争激烈,尤其是在空间供暖和热水,烹饪和干衣应用中。 AGA的调查结果断言,以完整的燃料循环为基础进行评估时,在住宅应用中使用天然气而不是电力,石油或丙烷可导致能源生产,消费者能源账单和空气污染物排放量显着减少。天然气集团宣称:“重要的是,影响能源事务的政府政策和法规必须基于对能源效率和环境影响的准确测量。”今天,大多数影响能源事务的政策和法规都是基于场所的,并且仅考虑最终消耗能量的场所的影响。 AGA警告说,这些法规,例如电器效率标准和测量,可能导致能源消耗更高以及污染程度更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号