...
首页> 外文期刊>Foundations of science >Embracing the Political in Technology and Transition Studies: A Response to Philip Vergragt and Bram Bos
【24h】

Embracing the Political in Technology and Transition Studies: A Response to Philip Vergragt and Bram Bos

机译:拥抱技术与转型研究中的政治:对Philip Vergragt和Bram Bos的回应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This article is a short reaction to the comments of Vergragt (Found Sci, 2012) and Bos (Found Sci, 2012) on my article "Sustainability transition and the nature of technology" (Paredis in Found Sci 16(2-3):195-225, Paredis 2011). I start by situating current transition research in the sustainability debate. The relation between the two is simultaneously specific and vague: specific about processes at work during transitions, vague about the content and direction of the change. I then move on to a discussion of how a better conceptualisation of technology could strengthen the transition framework. I want to thank the two reviewers for their critical remarks, that stimulated me to better explain my position.
机译:本文是对Vergragt(Found Sci,2012)和Bos(Found Sci,2012)对我的文章“可持续转型和技术本质”(Paredis in Found Sci 16(2-3):195)的评论的简短反应。 -225,Paredis 2011)。首先,我将当前的转型研究放在可持续性辩论中。两者之间的关系同时是特定和模糊的:特定于过渡期间工作中的流程,模糊了变更的内容和方向。然后,我继续讨论如何更好地对技术进行概念化来增强过渡框架。我要感谢两位审稿人的批评性言论,这激发了我更好地解释我的立场。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号