首页> 外文期刊>Foundations of science >Ten Misconceptions from the History of Analysis and Their Debunking
【24h】

Ten Misconceptions from the History of Analysis and Their Debunking

机译:分析史上的十大误解及其揭穿

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The widespread idea that infinitesimals were "eliminated" by the "great triumvirate" of Cantor, Dedekind, and Weierstrass is refuted by an uninterrupted chain of work on infinitesimal-enriched number systems. The elimination claim is an oversimplification created by triumvirate followers, who tend to view the history of analysis as a pre-ordained march toward the radiant future of Weierstrassian epsilontics. In the present text, we document distortions of the history of analysis stemming from the triumvirate ideology of ontological minimalism, which identified the continuum with a single number system. Such anachronistic distortions characterize the received interpretation of Stevin, Leibniz, d'Alembert, Cauchy, and others.
机译:普遍认为无穷小被Cantor,Dedekind和Weierstrass的“伟大的凯旋”所“消除”,这一点被无穷小丰富的数系统上不间断的工作链所驳斥。淘汰的主张是过分追求者的过分简化,他们趋向于将分析的历史视为迈向Weierstrassian epsilontics的光辉未来的既定步伐。在本文中,我们记录了由于本体论极简主义的反复无常的意识形态而导致的分析历史的歪曲,后者用单一数字系统识别了连续体。这种过时的扭曲是对史蒂文,莱布尼兹,达朗伯,柯西和其他人的解释的特征。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号