...
首页> 外文期刊>Foster Natural Gas Report >Jordan Cove/Pacific Connector Respond to Jurisdictional Overlap Concerns Raised by State of Oregon and Western Environmental Law Center
【24h】

Jordan Cove/Pacific Connector Respond to Jurisdictional Overlap Concerns Raised by State of Oregon and Western Environmental Law Center

机译:Jordan Cove / Pacific连接器回应俄勒冈州和西方环境法律中心提出的管辖权重叠问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Jordan Cove Energy Project, LP (CP07-444) and Pacific Connector Gas Pipeline, LP (CP07-441 et al.) again rebutted critics of their liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminal and pipeline plans in the U.S. Northwest, the State of Oregon and the Western Environmental Law Center (WELC), the developers argued, make "broad general attacks" on FERC's order issued 12/17/09 and Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) in their requests for rehearing. According to Jordan Cove, there is no basis for claims that the Commission's order granting authorization under section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (NGA) and issuing certificates was inconsistent with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the NGA and the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), nor for the protesters' contention that the Commission failed to adequately analyze the environmental impacts of the project or the alternatives to it, improperly deferred essential analysis, and erroneously determined that the project would be in the public interest.
机译:约旦湾能源项目公司(LP)(CP07-444)和太平洋连接器天然气管道公司(CP07-441等)再次反驳了其在美国西北部俄勒冈州的液化天然气(LNG)终端和管道计划的批评者开发商争辩说,西方环境法律中心(WELC)在FERC要求重审的请求中对FERC的命令(2009年12月17日发布)和最终环境影响声明(FEIS)进行了“广泛的全面攻击”。根据约旦·科夫(Jordan Cove)的说法,没有理由声称委员会根据《天然气法》(NGA)第3节授予命令的授权和颁发证书与《国家环境政策法》(NEPA),《国家法律法规》和《行政程序法》不一致(APA),也没有抗议者认为委员会未能充分分析该项目或其替代方案对环境的影响,不恰当地推迟了必要的分析,并错误地认为该项目符合公共利益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号