首页> 外文期刊>Foster Natural Gas Report >ExxonMobil Gas & Power and Hess Request Rehearing of FERC Order Addressing Sea Robin's Hurricane Surcharge
【24h】

ExxonMobil Gas & Power and Hess Request Rehearing of FERC Order Addressing Sea Robin's Hurricane Surcharge

机译:埃克森美孚天然气与电力公司和Hess要求对FERC订单进行演习,以解决海罗宾飓风附加费

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

ExxonMobil Gas & Power Marketing Co. and Hess Corp. requested rehearing of a September 30 order in which FERC accepted and suspended the 8/31/09 tariff filing by Sea Robin Pipeline Co. LLC (RP09-995) to (1) establish a surcharge mechanism for the recovery of capital and related operation and maintenance (O&M) expenses to mitigate damage to its facilities from hurricanes, and (2) to impose an initial Hurricane Surcharge of $0.0401/dth covering costs purportedly caused by damage related to Hurricane Ike in September 2008. The Commission made its acceptance subject to refund and hearing procedures, and suspended the effectiveness of the surcharge until next March, but ExxonMobil/Hess jointly argued that acceptance of the initial proposed Hurricane Surcharge based on costs incurred prior to the effective date of the surcharge mechanism violated the filed rate doctrine and the rule against retroactive ratemaking. According to the petitioners, the Commission in fact departed from well-established precedent establishing the filed rate doctrine, the rule against retroactive ratemaking, the Commission's regulations limiting use of Periodic Rate Adjustment (PRA) filings to a single cost item, regulations barring the recovery of costs pre-dating the effectiveness of the tariff language setting forth a PRA mechanism, and Commission orders enforcing this precedent and these regulations.
机译:埃克森美孚天然气和电力营销公司和Hess Corp.要求重新审理9月30日的命令,其中FERC接受并暂停了Sea Robin Pipeline Co. LLC(RP09-995)的8/31/09关税备案,以便(1)建立一个回收资本和相关运营与维护(O&M)费用的附加费机制,以减轻飓风对其设施造成的损害;(2)征收0.0401美元/天的初始飓风附加费,以弥补因艾克飓风造成的相关损失2008年9月。委员会将接受退款和听证程序,并中止附加费的有效期至明年3月,但埃克森美孚/黑斯联合认为,根据提议的生效日期之前发生的费用,接受最初提议的飓风附加费。附加费机制违反了提成费率原则和反追溯费率制定规则。根据请愿人的说法,欧洲委员会实际上偏离了建立归档利率理论的先例,反对追溯性利率制定的规则,欧洲委员会的法规将定期利率调整(PRA)归档的使用限制为单个成本项目,禁止回收的法规在制定PRA机制的关税语言生效之前花费的费用,委员会命令执行该先例和这些法规。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号